adding additional 'Party Identifier' fields for a Collector

paradisec-archive / nabu

nabu is a digital media item management system that provides a catalog of audio and video items, metadata for these items, and information about the workflow status of the items.

GNU General Public License v3.0

17 stars 8 forks source link

adding additional 'Party Identifier' fields for a Collector #608

Open enwardy opened 7 years ago

enwardy commented 7 years ago

to allow for different types of party identifiers (e.g. NLA, ORCID) to be recorded

JonoGillett commented 7 years ago

@enwardy are you able to elaborate on this requirement? Given that users in the system already have a 'party identifier' attribute, my reading of this task is that you want to allow multiple 'party identifiers' (but only when the user is a collector) - is that correct?

You've also mentioned 'types' - are those simply possible values which could be added to the one 'party identifiers' list, or are they separate categories of party identifiers each of which can contain more than one identifier?

LindaBarwick commented 7 years ago

Each party identifier needs to have a type to specify. Only one identifier for each type. Multiple identifiers of different types for each person. Needed mostly for collectors though there may be other use cases.

On 23 Jan 2017, at 4:16 pm, JonoGillett notifications@github.com wrote:

@enwardy are you able to elaborate on this requirement? Given that users in the system already have a 'party identifier' attribute, my reading of this task is that you want to allow multiple 'party identifiers' (but only when the user is a collector) - is that correct?

You've also mentioned 'types' - are those simply possible values which could be added to the one 'party identifiers' list, or are they separate categories of party identifiers each of which can contain more than one identifier?

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

JonoGillett commented 7 years ago

Ok, so to clarify:

there are multiple types of identifiers (ORCID, NLA etc - and presumably we want the ability to add more later?)
each user can optionally have one identifier of each type (but not multiple for the same type)
we don't want to restrict this behaviour just to collectors

Does that sound right?

LindaBarwick commented 7 years ago

I think that is correct but we should verify with Nick Ward

On 23 Jan 2017, at 5:35 pm, JonoGillett notifications@github.com wrote:

Ok, so to clarify:

there are multiple types of identifiers (ORCID, NLA etc - and presumably we want the ability to add more later?) each user can optionally have one identifier of each type (but not multiple for the same type) we don't want to restrict this behaviour just to collectors Does that sound right?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

enwardy commented 7 years ago

Yes, that is correct.

enwardy commented 6 years ago

still outstanding, but not sure now about Priority level of this (perhaps not #1)

johnf commented 4 months ago

@nthieberger is this still relevant?