Fluent, chainable Widget finders and better assertions for Flutter widget tests
⛓️ Chainable widget selectors 💙 Prints helpful error messages
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:spot/spot.dart';
void main() {
testWidgets('Widget test with spot', (tester) async {
// Create widget selectors for elements in the widget tree
final scaffold = spot<MaterialApp>().spot<Scaffold>();
final appBar = scaffold.spot<AppBar>();
// Assert for values of widgets
appBar.spotText('Dash').hasFontSize(14).hasFontColor(Colors.black87);
// Find widgets based on child widgets
appBar
.spot<IconButton>(children: [spotIcon(Icons.home)])
.existsOnce()
.hasTooltip('home');
// Find widgets based on multiple parent widgets
spot<Icon>(parents: [appBar, spot<IconButton>()])
.existsExactlyNTimes(2)
.all((icon) {
icon.hasColorWhere((color) => color.equals(Colors.black));
});
// Interact with widgets using `act`
final button = spot<FloatingActionButton>();
await act.tap(button);
final text = spot<TextField>();
await act.enterText(text, 'Hello World');
});
}
Take screenshots of your entire screen or single widgets to see what's going on.
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:spot/spot.dart';
void main() {
testWidgets('Take screenshots', (tester) async {
tester.pumpWidget(MyApp());
// Take a screenshot of the entire screen
await takeScreenshot();
// console:
// Screenshot file:///var/folders/0j/p0s0zrv91tgd33zrxb88c0440000gn/T/spot/screenshot_test:10-s83dv.png
// taken at main.<fn> file:///Users/pascalwelsch/Projects/passsy/spot/test/spot/screenshot_test.dart:10:10
// Take a screenshot of a single widget
await spot<AppBar>().takeScreenshot();
// console:
// Screenshot file:///var/folders/0j/p0s0zrv91tgd33zrxb88c0440000gn/T/spot/screenshot_test:16-w8UPv.png
// taken at main.<fn> file:///Users/pascalwelsch/Projects/passsy/spot/test/spot/screenshot_test.dart:16:24
});
}
You know exactly where your widgets are. Like a button in the AppBar or a Text in a Dialog. Spot allows you to chain matchers, narrowing down the search space.
Chaining allows spot to create better error messages for you.
Spot follows the chain of your selectors and can tell you exactly where the widget is missing.
Like: Could not find "IconButton" in "AppBar", but found these widgets instead: <AppBar-widget-tree>.
spot<AppBar>().spot<IconButton>();
spot<IconButton>(parents: [spot<AppBar>()]);
Both syntax are identical. The first is shorter for when you only need a single parent. The second allows checking for multiple parents, which is only required for rare use cases.
Spot has two features, creating selectors and asserting on them with matchers.
A selector is a query to find a set of widgets. Like a SQL query, or a CSS selector. It is only a description of what to search for, without actually doing the search.
Selectors can be rather complex, it is therefore recommended to reuse them. You can even save them top-level and reuse them across multiple tests.
spot<ElevatedButton>();
final WidgetSelector<TextField> textFields =
spot<LoginScreen>().spot<LoginForm>().spot<TextField>();
final WidgetSelector<TextField> usernameTextField =
spot<TextField>(
parents: [
spot<TextWithLabel>(
children: [
spotText('Username'),
],
),
],
);
A WidgetSelector
may return 0, 1 or N widgets.
Depending on how many widgets you expect to find, you should use the corresponding matchers.
After creating a selector, you want to assert the widgets it found.
The snapshot()
method creates a WidgetSnapshot
of the widget tree at that point in time and finds all widgets that match the selector.
The easiest matchers are the quantity matchers. They allow checking how many widgets were found.
existsOnce()
asserts that exactly one widget was founddoesNotExist()
asserts that no widget was foundexistsExactlyNTimes(n)
asserts that exactly n
widgets were foundexistsAtLeastOnce()
asserts that at least one widget was foundexistsAtMostOnce()
asserts that at most one widget was found
final selector = spot<ElevatedButton>();
// calls snapshot() internally
final matchOne = selector.existsOnce();
final matchMultiple = selector.existsExactlyNTimes(5);
selector.doesNotExist(); // end, nothing to match on
The property matchers allow asserting on the properties of the widgets.
You don't have to use execpt()
, instead you can use the has*
/is*
matchers directly.
spot<Tooltip>()
.existsOnce() // takes snapshot and asserts quantity
// start your chain of matchers
.hasMessage('Favorite')
.hasShowDurationWhere(
(it) => it.isGreaterOrEqual(Duration(seconds: 1000)),
)
.hasTriggerMode(TooltipTriggerMode.longPress);
To match multiple widgets use all()
or any()
spot<AppBar>().spot<Tooltip>().existsAtLeastOnce()
.all((tooltip) => tooltip
.hasShowDurationWhere((it) => it.isGreaterOrEqual(Duration(seconds: 1000)))
.hasTriggerMode(TooltipTriggerMode.longPress)
);
It is recommended to use matchers instead of selectors once you have narrowed down the search space to the widget you want to assert on.
This makes the error messages much clearer.
Instead of widget not found
you'll get Found ToolTip with message 'Settings' but expected 'Favorite'
as error message.
// DON'T
spot<Tooltip>()
.withMessage('Favorite') // selector
.withTriggerMode(TooltipTriggerMode.longPress) // selector
.existsOnce();
// DO
spot<Tooltip>()
.existsOnce()
.hasMessage('Favorite') // matcher
.hasTriggerMode(TooltipTriggerMode.longPress); // matcher
By default, spot()
only finds widgets that are "onstage", not hidden with the Offstage
widget.
To find offstage widgets, start your widget selector with spotOffstage()
.
Search for both - the on- and offstage widgets - with spotAllWidgets()
.
For existing selectors, use overrideWidgetPresence(WidgetPresence presence)
to modify the presence to offstage
, onstage
or combined
.
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
import 'package:spot/spot.dart';
void main() {
testWidgets('Spot offstage and combined widgets', (tester) async {
await tester.pumpWidget(
MaterialApp(
home: Row(
children: [
Text('a'),
Text('b'),
Offstage(child: Text('c')),
],
),
),
);
spot<Text>().withText('a').existsOnce();
spot<Text>().withText('c').doesNotExist();
spot<Text>().withText('c').overrideWidgetPresence(WidgetPresence.offstage).existsOnce();
spotOffstage().spot<Text>().atMost(3);
spotOffstage().spotText('c').existsOnce();
spotOffstage().overrideWidgetPresence(WidgetPresence.onstage).spotText('c').doesNotExist();
spotAllWidgets().spotText('a').existsOnce();
spotAllWidgets().spotText('c').existsOnce();
spotOffstage().overrideWidgetPresence(WidgetPresence.combined).spotText('a').existsOnce();
spotOffstage().overrideWidgetPresence(WidgetPresence.combined).spotText('c').existsOnce();
});
}
In case the settings icon doesn't exist you usually would get the following error using findsOneWidget
expect(find.byIcon(Icons.settings), findsOneWidget);
>>> Expected: exactly one matching node in the widget tree
>>> Actual: _WidgetIconFinder:<zero widgets with icon "IconData(U+0E57F)" (ignoring offstage widgets)>
>>> Which: means none were found but one was expected
The error message above is not really helpful, because the actual error is not that there's no icon, but the Icons.home
instead of Icons.settings
.
spot prints the entire widget tree and shows that there is an Icon
, but the wrong one (IconData(U+0E318)
).
That's much more helpful!
In the future, spot will only print the widget tree from the last node found node (spot<AppBar>
).
spot<AppBar>().spotIcon(Icons.settings).existsOnce();
Could not find 'icon "IconData(U+0E57F)"' as child of #2 type "IconButton"
There are 1 possible parents for 'icon "IconData(U+0E57F)"' matching #2 type "IconButton". But non matched. The widget trees starting at #2 type "IconButton" are:
Possible parent 0:
IconButton(Icon, padding: EdgeInsets.all(8.0), dependencies: [_InheritedTheme, IconTheme, _LocalizationsScope-[GlobalKey#bdafc]])
└Semantics(container: false, properties: SemanticsProperties, renderObject: RenderSemanticsAnnotations#9b22d relayoutBoundary=up13)
└InkResponse
└_InkResponseStateWidget(gestures: [tap], mouseCursor: SystemMouseCursor(click), BoxShape.circle, dependencies: [MediaQuery], state: _InkResponseState#181bf)
└_ParentInkResponseProvider
└Actions(dispatcher: null, actions: {ActivateIntent: CallbackAction<ActivateIntent>#fded7, ButtonActivateIntent: CallbackAction<ButtonActivateIntent>#5d1ad}, state: _ActionsState#f4947)
└_ActionsMarker
└Focus(dependencies: [_FocusMarker], state: _FocusState#3db93)
└_FocusMarker
└Semantics(container: false, properties: SemanticsProperties, renderObject: RenderSemanticsAnnotations#d907f relayoutBoundary=up14)
└MouseRegion(listeners: [enter, exit], cursor: SystemMouseCursor(click), renderObject: RenderMouseRegion#49c96 relayoutBoundary=up15)
└Semantics(container: false, properties: SemanticsProperties, renderObject: RenderSemanticsAnnotations#e83d5 relayoutBoundary=up16)
└GestureDetector(startBehavior: start, dependencies: [MediaQuery])
└RawGestureDetector(state: RawGestureDetectorState#2d012(gestures: [tap], excludeFromSemantics: true, behavior: opaque))
└Listener(listeners: [down], behavior: opaque, renderObject: RenderPointerListener#cab1c relayoutBoundary=up17)
└ConstrainedBox(BoxConstraints(48.0<=w<=Infinity, 48.0<=h<=Infinity), renderObject: RenderConstrainedBox#96a26 relayoutBoundary=up18)
└Padding(padding: EdgeInsets.all(8.0), dependencies: [Directionality], renderObject: RenderPadding#c223d relayoutBoundary=up19)
└SizedBox(width: 24.0, height: 24.0, renderObject: RenderConstrainedBox#d47d4 relayoutBoundary=up20)
└Align(alignment: Alignment.center, dependencies: [Directionality], renderObject: RenderPositionedBox#ac4b6)
└Builder(dependencies: [IconTheme])
└IconTheme(color: Color(0xffffffff), size: 24.0)
└Icon(IconData(U+0E318), dependencies: [Directionality, IconTheme])
└Semantics(container: false, properties: SemanticsProperties, renderObject: RenderSemanticsAnnotations#ec9ab relayoutBoundary=up1)
└ExcludeSemantics(excluding: true, renderObject: RenderExcludeSemantics#5b179 relayoutBoundary=up2)
└SizedBox(width: 24.0, height: 24.0, renderObject: RenderConstrainedBox#eefd6 relayoutBoundary=up3)
└Center(alignment: Alignment.center, dependencies: [Directionality], renderObject: RenderPositionedBox#4c194)
└RichText(textDirection: ltr, softWrap: wrapping at box width, overflow: visible, maxLines: unlimited, text: "", dependencies: [_LocalizationsScope-[GlobalKey#bdafc]], renderObject: RenderParagraph#35451 relayoutBoundary=up1)
══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following TestFailure was thrown running a test:
Could not find 'icon "IconData(U+0E57F)"' as child of [type "MaterialApp" > 'type "Scaffold"' >
'type "AppBar"' && type "IconButton"]
WidgetSelector
sWidgetSelector
with childrenWidgetSelector
with parentsFinder
APIDiagnosticsNode
)act
)WidgetSelector
APIand
act
featuresSpot is used in production by many apps already. The current plan is to merge spot somehow with patrol, the next big milestone.
The public spot<X>()
API just received a rework in 0.10.0
which cleans up and simplifies the API. (Awaiting feedback)
The act
API is still experimental and has known issues. (WIP)
Even though things are still fluid, spot
today already provides a lot of value over the traditional finder
API.
Copyright 2022 Pascal Welsch
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.