This is the place for WG 9 members to submit informal comments on the 202x source document. (This is not the formal ballot that WG 9 will hold later in the process.)
0
stars
0
forks
source link
4.3 - new rules to accommodate container aggregates #135
In AARM 3.c(5), I was briefly confused reading
Thus, we allow ... ..., even though only delta_aggregates
allow private types or extensions.
What wasn't clear at first was that the word "private" applied not just
to "types" but also to "extensions". Would it be clearer to
say "private types or private extensions"?
In AARM 3.c(5), I was briefly confused reading Thus, we allow ... ..., even though only delta_aggregates
allow private types or extensions.
What wasn't clear at first was that the word "private" applied not just to "types" but also to "extensions". Would it be clearer to say "private types or private extensions"?
SteveB