pat-rogers / Ada-202x-WG9-Informal-Review

This is the place for WG 9 members to submit informal comments on the 202x source document. (This is not the formal ballot that WG 9 will hold later in the process.)
0 stars 0 forks source link

4.3 - new rules to accommodate container aggregates #135

Open pat-rogers opened 3 years ago

pat-rogers commented 3 years ago

In AARM 3.c(5), I was briefly confused reading Thus, we allow ... ..., even though only delta_aggregates allow private types or extensions.

What wasn't clear at first was that the word "private" applied not just to "types" but also to "extensions". Would it be clearer to say "private types or private extensions"?

SteveB

ARG-Editor commented 3 years ago

Added to the AARM AI, AI12-0005-1.