Experimental RISC-V RT extension implementation.
Welcome to the RISC-V RT Discord server for discussions/suggestions etc.
Architectural design follows the submitted proposal (contact per.lindgren@ltu.se for pre-print). The design goal of RISC-V RT is to provide a specification for light-weight MCU implementations enabling the implementation of (hard) real-time systems. RISC-V RT currently features:
Design elements are scaled with the selected number of priority levels, thus allowing to trade scheduling flexibility against hardware implementation cost.
The design acts a reference implementation for the RISC-V RT extension, and should be consider the specification.
Additional features of Hippomenes, not part of the RISC-V RT specification are
The design follows semantic versioning (regarding expected behavior) along the triple, $x.y.z$:
As the RISC-V RT (and its reference implementation) is not yet considered feature complete:
See CHANGELOG.md for current status.
The repository is structured as follows:
fpga
, backend workflow (currently targeting Vivado/Xilinx Pynq-Z1, more targets will follow)hdl
src
, general top level sources and test benchescore
, Hippomenes specific sources and test benchesverilator
, simulation setup.The design can be simulated using the Verilator tool, see Simulation.
See below Example
The design can be synthesized to the entry level Pynq-Z1 platform using the Vivado tool, see Synthesis.
Hippomenes RTL at top level:
Resource usage for a configuration with 4 priority levels (as the ARM Cortex M0) and 4K of SRAM is depicted below:
The data memory (dmem
) stands for the majority of the required resources, while the stacked register file (rf
) and (n-clic
) together amounts to a third of the resources used.
Looking closer at the resource utilization:
And in comparison to resources available for the entry level Pynq-Z1:
Interesting here is that the total design amounts to less than 4 percent of the logic resources, thus the design can be considered ultra light-weight.
This is also reflected by the modest synthesis time, less than 2 minutes for a clean build flow (synthesis, implementation, bitmap generation and target deployment) on a standard desktop (Amd-7950x3d, 32 gig-ram, running arch linux 6.9 and Vivado 2023-2). (Iterative builds are typically faster.)
The RISC-RT and its implementation has been modelled using the SyncRim tool. The high-level SyncRim model and its implementation is in 1-1 functional correspondence, thus providing an interactive, cycle accurate, high-level simulation model of the proposed RISC-V RT specification.
The below example showcase prominent features of the RISC-V RT, and the Hippomenes reference implementation:
.option norvc
.text
init: la sp, _stack_start # set stack pointer
main: csrwi 0x300, 8 # enable global interrupts
la t1, isr_0
srl t1, t1, 2
csrw 0xB00, t1 # setup isr_0 address
li t2, 0b11110000 # interrupt every 16 cycles, cmp value 0b1111 = 15, prescaler 0b0000
csrw 0x400, t2 # timer.counter_top CSR
la t1, 0b1110 # priority 0b11, enable, 0b1, pend 0b0
csrw 0xB20, t1 # write above to interrupt 0 (timer interrupt)
stop: j stop # wait for interrupt
isr_0: la t0, .toggled # &static mut toggled state
lw t1, 0(t0) # deref toggled
xori t1, t1, 1 # toggle bit 0
csrw 0x0, t1 # set bit 0 (t1 = 1) in GPIO CSR (LED on/off)
sw t1, 0(t0) # store toggled value
csrr t3, 0xB40 # read captured timestamp
sw t3, 4(t0) # store timestamp
jr ra # return
.data
.toggled: .word 0x0 # state
.word 0x0 # time-stamp
The run-time (.init
) for this case is a single instruction to setup the (shared) stack pointer. The application (.main
) starts by enabling global interrupts (0x300
), setting up the interrupt vector address (0xb00
) for isr_0
(the vector table does not store the two least significant bits so we shift right by 2). We then configure the timer peripheral (x400
) to generate an interrupt each 15 cycles. Finally we configure the interrupt control (xb20
), setting priority to 3, and the enable bit to 1, and wait in a busy loop for interrupts to occur.
The interrupt handler (isr_0
) reads the local resource (.toggled
), toggles bit 0, updates the gpio (0x0
) and stores the toggled value back to the local resource. It then reads the timestamp the interrupt (0xB40
) and stores that to the local resource.
A SyncRim simulation is show below:
At the end of the isr_0
, the register ra
has the value 0xFFFFFFFF
indicating to the n-clic
to return to the preempted task (.stop
in this case). The .toggled.led_state
is 00000001
(as indicated by the LED bit 0 being lit red). The .toggled.timestamp
value is 00000019
, indicate the global monotonic time when the interrupt was captured.
State at next interrupt return is shown below:
At this point we see that the .toggled.led_state
is 00000000
(as indicated by the LED bit 0 being grey). The .toggled.timestamp
value is 0000002a
, indicate the global monotonic time when the interrupt was captured. The timer re-load has for this implementation a latency of 1.
The same program as run using the Verilator test-bench shows:
To the left the set of signals to view is shown, for this example the reset
, clk
, pc
instruction
and n_clic_interrupt
. The cursor is placed at the entry of the second timer interrupt. We can observe that there is exactly 16 clock cycles between interrupts. (The observant reader also observes that the first timer interrupt is taken directly after initialization, wether this is a desired behavior can be debated, but it is in our hands to specify and implement as we see fit!)
CSRs underlies all peripheral implementations (the internal n_clic
and external timer
and gpio
). As an example of simplicity, the peripheral is implemented in timer.sv, inlined here in its entirety.
// timer
`timescale 1ns / 1ps
// Programmable timer peripheral
module timer
import config_pkg::*;
import decoder_pkg::*;
(
input logic clk,
input logic reset,
input logic csr_enable,
input CsrAddrT csr_addr,
input csr_op_t csr_op,
input r rs1_zimm,
input word rs1_data,
input TimerT ext_data,
input logic ext_write_enable,
input logic interrupt_clear,
output logic interrupt_set,
output word csr_direct_out,
output word csr_out
);
TimerWidthT counter;
TimerT timer;
csr #(
.CsrWidth(TimerTWidth),
.Addr(TimerAddr)
) csr_timer (
// in
.clk,
.reset,
.csr_enable,
.csr_addr,
.csr_op,
.rs1_zimm,
.rs1_data,
// external access for side effects
.ext_data,
.ext_write_enable,
// out
.direct_out(csr_direct_out),
.out(csr_out)
);
assign timer = csr_timer.data;
always_ff @(posedge clk) begin
if (reset) begin
counter <= 0;
interrupt_set <= 0;
end else begin
if (timer.counter_top << timer.prescaler == counter) begin
$display("counter top: counter = %d", counter);
counter <= 0;
interrupt_set <= 1;
end else begin
if (interrupt_clear) interrupt_set <= 0;
counter <= counter + 1;
end
end
end
endmodule
As seen it instantiates a single CSR, which address (TimerAddr
) and layout (`TimerT) is defined in the config_pkg.sv.
localparam CsrAddrT TimerAddr = 'h400;
// Peripheral timer
localparam TimerWidth = 16;
localparam TimerPreWith = 4;
localparam type TimerWidthT = logic [TimerWidth-1:0];
localparam type TimerPresWidthT = logic [TimerPreWith-1:0];
typedef struct packed {
TimerWidthT counter_top;
TimerPresWidthT prescaler; // LSB
} TimerT;
As seen there is currently just a counter_top
and prescaler
(we kept it simple). As a side effect, the timer
has in Verilator simulation the reset value 0, thus a match to the counter
register will happen immediately after reset, the interrupt_set
goes high, and and the interrupt is dispatched by the n_clic
as soon as the corresponding enable bit in the vector table is set.
HDL sources are written in synthesis friendly SystemVerilog. The design is kept minimal, as reported by cloc
the core is about 1k-loc with another 1k-loc of test-benches (one for each component). Top level includes data and instruction memory, where XPM-SPRAM (Xilinx proprietary single ported block-ram) is used by Vivado for synthesis for both simulation and synthesis of the instruction memory. This allows post-synthesis updates of memory content, without re-synthesis (vastly improving code-change iterations). (Verilator
based simulation uses a simpler rom model with the same functionality). Timing is met at approximately 50MHz which is surprisingly good for a single cycle/non-pipelined design (no backend tuning has been applied). During development it is however recommended to target lower frequencies to improve synthesis iterations, a full iteration cycle (synthesis, implementation and bitstream generation) is well under 2 minutes at 20MHz on a standard desktop (AMD 7950x3d 32G ram, Vivado 2023.2).
A single file config_pkg.sv
is used to configure Hippomenes, defaulting to a light-weight configuration with 4 interrupt priorities and 8 interrupt vectors.
Top level defines the interface to the environment, currently:
The released version does not ship with any ILA/DGB blocks activated, as their use is very much feature specific.
In line with requirements to memory safety, Hippomenes is leveraging on the Rust language and ecosystem. The only pre-requisite is a working Rust tool-chain. The Rust tooling is fully integrated with the Pynq-Z1 target, offering dfu like programming with iterations (source code updates to code deployed) in less than 15 seconds. Jtag debug functionality and probe-rs is planned.
RISC-V RT draws on the success of the Rust project in allowing both progression and stability at the same time through semantic versioning.
The RISC-V RT specification is open for You and everybody else. Fork the project, make changes and open an issue/PR. If/when your PR is eventually merged, it IS the specification of RISC-V RT associated to its semantic version.
This is very different from the riscv.org, where the specification lacks a reference implementation and might or might not make sense in practice. RISC-V RT on the other hand requires you to implement it, and come up with examples and tests that showcase its use and correctness. It allows for an agile development process, the CLIC spec specification has been in flux since 2018 (more than 6 years) without ratification.
The exact form of Contributions is not yet defined, please suggest the form you would prefer in Issue 3.
To be determined, contact per.lindgren@ltu.se for licensing questions. Please suggest in Issue 2 what You think is the best license for the project.