Open dgasmith opened 7 years ago
Citation and link should be replaced with a provenance field.
Should the provenance
field have the same inner fields as the molecular provenance
field?
Absolutely, lets keep it consistent.
Cheers, Daniel Smith
On Nov 30, 2016, at 11:41, Nick Petosa notifications@github.com wrote:
Citation and link should be replaced with a provenance field.
Should the provenance field have the same inner fields as the molecular provenance field?
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/petosa/mongo_qcdb/issues/3#issuecomment-263924612, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABsBcUDlwsG-KvGOp1gnQXMmlphXSJqpks5rDadUgaJpZM4LAL9j.
Added in 9c46631b36be2fe62bb8be75d763fc80de87a39b
We currently have:
Values should have the following names:
Citation and link should be replaced with a provenance field.
I think if you make the changes here and in databases we can probably generate some fake data to play with.