Closed ariefwt closed 2 years ago
I can see why this would be interesting. I do see one issue thought: if the user select the Cessna 172 as a rentable plane, it would be the same as loading the entire world... For user/group owned planes, this seems reasonable, no so much for worldwide rentable planes. Not sure what would be the correct radius. 300 NM seems ok for passenger terminal jobs, but not VIP jobs. Obviously, users could choose the radius, but I am a bit afraid that they would set it to high, and basically download the entire world (which is not possible).
About the radius, my suggestion is to allow a user input to configure this to each's own liking (at least the way I foresee using it is by searching for airports within 2 hours of flight, which varies from plane to plane)
I agree that we don't need to do any kind of extra filtering for user/group owned planes, they should always be included, but there are many interesting rentable planes that isn't as abundant as C172/C208 (e.g., the ATRs)
With this in mind, how about something like this:
(I suggested prioritizing cheapest rentable planes first because it might not be appealing to rent at cutthroat prices, but there may be other better sorting methods)
In this case, there'll be two settings: the radius, and the limit of airports to download (in case the user doesn't mind the system to perform multiple API calls)
I have finally found some time to implement this, should be available in the next release!
I'd like to propose adding a way to load jobs from airports within a configurable distance/range from airports with available planes (the red-colored airports) — e.g., load jobs from
300 NM
around red airportsThis will be extremely helpful to find the best routes based red airports (i.e., airports that we can really fly from). Available planes may span across multiple countries or areas, which the current filters doesn't readily support (including a whole country also includes areas of a country that doesn't have available plane, custom area doesn't allow multiple selection)
Thank you for your consideration!