Closed orichters closed 2 weeks ago
If I am not mistaken, in EDGET we usually use as a cost unit $2005/(p or t)km, which we do not change in the reporting script. But, in the reporting you are referring to it is different: Overview:
capCosts <- loadCapCosts(demand_km)
repCapCosts <- reporting(dt = capCosts, mode = "CC")
We then add repCapCosts to the mif file.
In detail:
loadCapCosts
multiplies costs in $2005/km with demand_km
So capCosts is in $2005
reporting takes capCosts [$2005] as an input, makes no unit changes --> so we end up with $2005
But isn't demand_km in km/yr
, and therefore capCost in $2005/yr
?
yes, I agree with Oliver - the unit of the aggregate value calculated from (cost per km) times (km per year)
should be bn$2005/yr
Also on the first part - for harmonizing variable names and reducing the potential for misunderstandings, I would call this absolute value something like Energy Investments|Demand|xxx
to be in line with current REMIND naming (the IAMC uses Investment|Energy Demand|xxx
, but I would prefer to be consistent within REMIND on this)
@robertpietzcker I wrote on my non-urgent todo list "Rename CC in reporting, example: Capital Cost|Transport|Pass|Rail --> Energy Investments|Demand|Transport|Pass|Rail"
Could you quickly confirm that this is, what I am supposed to do?
yes, that would be perfect.
and similarly, check if the units are correct - so "$2005/[p/t]km" for the intensive variable handed to REMIND (in case that is ever reported), and "bn $2005/yr" for the extensive variable that you get when multiplying the intensive variable by the transport volume
The variable has been removed in EDGE-T 2.0.0
Tech|Electricity|Coal|Pulverised Coal w/o CC|Capital Costs
is measured inUS$2005/kW
Capital Cost|Transport|Pass|Rail
is measured inbn US$2005
. That seems to be an remind-internal inconsistency in naming whether Capital Cost is just an investment sum or per unit of capacity. Also, I wonder if that should not be a per year value for EDGE-T.