polleverywhere / message_router

A router for small messages, like Tweets and SMS
MIT License
14 stars 1 forks source link

= Message Router

{Build Status}[https://travis-ci.org/polleverywhere/message_router] {}[https://codeclimate.com/github/polleverywhere/message_router]

Message router is a DSL for routing and processing simple messages, like SMS messages or Tweets.

== Installation

sudo gem install message_router

== Example Code

See rdoc for MessageRouter::Router.build (lib/message_router/router.rb) for examples.

And now some irb action.

class HelloRouter < MessageRouter::Router
  match /hi/ do
    puts "Hi there. You sent me: #{env.inspect}"
    true # puts returns nil, and that would fail the matcher
  end
end
# => [[/hi/, #<Proc:0x00000000026963b8@(irb):2>]]
HelloRouter.call({'body' => 'can you say hi to me?'})
# Hi there. You sent me: {'body'=>"can you say hi to me?"}
# => true
class MainRouter < MessageRouter::Router
  match({'to' => 'greeter'}, HelloRouter)
  match(true) do
    puts "WTF? I don't know how to do that!"
    true # puts returns nil, and that would fail the matcher
  end
end
# => [[{"to"=>"greeter"}, HelloRouter], [true, #<Proc:0x007f98c39e5b70@(irb):13>]]
MainRouter.call({'body' => 'can you say hi to me?'})
# WTF? I don't know how to do that!
# => true
MainRouter.call({'body' => 'can you say hi to me?', 'to' => 'greeter'})
# Hi there. You sent me: {'body'=>"can you say hi to me?", 'to'=>"greeter"}
# => true

== TODO

Get docs working nicely (formatting, etc.) with RDoc.

Add tests to ensure that instance variables can be shared between initializers and helpers. For example: class MyRouter < MessageRouter::Router def initilaize(config) @sender = config[:sender] super end

  match true do
    send_something
  end

  def send_something
    @sender.puts 'something'
  end
end
MyRouter(:sender => STDOUT).call({})  # prints out 'something' to standard out.

Pass Regexp captures on to the proc when there is a match. Examples: match /some (cool|awesome) thing/ do |match| puts "You thought the thing was #{match[1]}" end match 'some_attr' => /some (cool|awesome) thing/, 'body' => /(.)/ do |matches| puts "You thought that #{matches['body'][1]} was #{matches['some_attr'][1]}" end -- OR -- match /some (cool|awesome) thing/ do puts "You thought the thing was #{env['message_router_match'][1]}" end match 'some_attr' => /some (cool|awesome) thing/, 'body' => /(.)/ do puts "You thought that #{env['message_router_matches']['body'][1]} was #{env['message_router_matches']['some_attr'][1]}" end -- OR -- (probably best because it is simplest) match /some (cool|awesome) thing(.)/ do |word, the_rest| puts "You thought the thing was #{word}. But the rest is #{the_rest}" end match 'some_attr' => /some (cool|awesome) thing(.)/, 'body' => /(.)/ do |hash| puts "You thought that #{hash['body']} was #{hash['some_attr'][0]}. But the rest is #{hash['some_attr'][1]}" end -- OR -- (if the note below about setting context/scope of annonymous functions is done) match /some (cool|awesome) thing(.)/ do |word, the_rest| puts "You thought the thing was #{word}. But the rest is #{the_rest}" end match 'some_attr' => /some (cool|awesome) thing(.)/, 'body' => /(.)/ do |hash| puts "You thought that #{hash['body']} was #{hash['some_attr'][0]}. But the rest is #{hash['some_attr'][1]}" end

Improve specs to minimize use of global variables. The idea below about passing copies of the env hash around (instead of modifying it in place) might help here. I could have various bits of code being tested modify the env hash, and the final return value would be the env hash, which I could examine.

Consider making the String matcher more flexible. There could be options for:

Recursion detection: It could be done by having a specific key in the message hash for parents. Before sending #call to a matcher's proc we could run something like "message['message_router_stack'] << self". Then we could check the size of this. The maximum number of levels would need to be configurable to allow some recursion.

Make helper methods defined (or included) in parent routers available in sub routers. It could be done with delegation, but that might get messy. It may be easier to not implement this and just require the user to use sub-classing to get the desired behavior.

Pass around copies of the env Hash instead of modifying the existing Hash in place.

Find a way to allow user-defined 'action' procs/blocks to not have to return a true value to be considered to have matched. We still need a way to know if a sub-router matched or not. This _may_require that the code treat sub-routers and user-defined 'action' procs/blocks differently, which could get awkward.

Allow routers to accept an optional logger. Depending on the log level, print out info such as:

Consider creating some sort of RouterRun class, each instance of which would encapsulate a call to MessageRouter::Router#call. This class would have all the helper methods as well as the #env helper method. This may help make this gem more threadsafe by keeping the shared state in the MessageRouter::Router objects immutable.

Consider having #call duplicate the router so that each run happens in its own instance. When MessageRouter::Router#call was called, call self.dup.call(env, :no_dup). This would create a copy of the router for handling the message. It would be safe to use instance variables, except (maybe) deep-nested ones, but they could be handled by requiring the user to overwrite #dup.

Consider having a class called Run nested within the router's namespace. Instead of allowing users to define helper methods inside the router, they would be defined inside a subclass of MessageGateway::Router::Run. MessageGateway::Router#call might look something like: def call(env) Run.new(env, self).run end Run#run might look something like: def run router.rules.detect do |condition, action| condition = if condition.kind_of?(Proc) self.instance_eval &condition else condition.call env end

    if condition
      action = if action.kind_of?(Proc)
        self.instance_eval &action
      else
        action.call env
      end

      return action if action
    end
  end
end

A user's router might look like this: class MyRouter < MessageRouter::Router match :hello? { say 'hi' } class Run < MessageRouter::Router::Run def hello? env['body'] == 'hi' end def say(msg) puts msg end end end This would make all instance variables inside the helpers safe and intuitive. I'd need to double check, but I think Ruby's constant lookup method would allow for inheritance to work fairly intuitively as long as the Run class and the router class both inherit from the same place. (I.e. if you inherit from MyBaseRouter, then your run class should also inherit from MyBaseRouter::Run.)

== License

Copyright (c) 2009-2012, Poll Everywhere

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.