Closed electronicsbyjulie closed 1 year ago
Using the coordinates in RCSB 8f76.pdb, of the ligand position shown in the above image, atom C3 of the propionate is indeed a little less than 4A from the nearest atoms of Phe155 and Leu158, meaning the hydrogens are closer together.
ATOM 1186 CG PHE A 155 123.911 116.152 85.579 1 35.73 C
ATOM 1187 CD1 PHE A 155 123.206 115.399 84.66 1 35.73 C
ATOM 1188 CD2 PHE A 155 124.186 115.594 86.814 1 35.73 C
ATOM 1189 CE1 PHE A 155 122.755 114.137 84.977 1 35.73 C
ATOM 1190 CE2 PHE A 155 123.746 114.322 87.123 1 35.73 C
ATOM 1191 CZ PHE A 155 123.027 113.6 86.206 1 35.73 C
...
ATOM 1215 CG LEU A 158 123.469 117.023 81.018 1 42.24 C
ATOM 1216 CD1 LEU A 158 122.15 117.122 81.738 1 42.24 C
ATOM 1217 CD2 LEU A 158 123.571 115.737 80.23 1 42.24 C
...
HETATM 8171 C1 PPI A 401 119.527 112.795 80.088 1 41.9 C
HETATM 8172 C2 PPI A 401 119.64 113.677 81.342 1 41.9 C
HETATM 8173 C3 PPI A 401 121.007 113.588 81.921 1 41.9 C
HETATM 8174 O1 PPI A 401 119.996 113.213 79.019 1 41.9 O
HETATM 8175 O2 PPI A 401 118.942 111.694 80.243 1 41.9 O
ATOM 1187 CD1 PHE A 155 2.20 1.81 2.74 3.95
ATOM 1189 CE1 PHE A 155 1.75 0.55 3.06 3.56
ATOM 1216 CD1 LEU A 158 1.14 3.53 -0.18 3.72
ATOM 1217 CD2 LEU A 158 2.56 2.15 -1.69 3.75
(Edited for formatting.)
Would be best to avoid reproducing copyrighted images. Not that there's anything desirable about journals putting scientific data behind paywalls, but why take the risk. This particular image is publicly available so I've edited your post to include a link instead.
That said, you raise a very good point.
There is now a vdW-bond-distance
branch with the requested change. Please check out the branch and test it to make sure it passes unit tests, including a visual inspection of the output SDF and output dock files. If it looks good, go ahead and merge it into your working branch for #290.
Too close. The alcohols' carbons are 3.0A apart.
Also on PDB output the ASCII 3-letter bug seems to have returned.
When you fix the 3-letter bug, let's add a unit test to make sure it doesn't recur.
The most commonly cited figure is around 4A between atoms, depending on vdW radii. But going off of the chart on this page:
https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry_Textbook_Maps/Supplemental_Modules_(Physical_and_Theoretical_Chemistry)/Physical_Properties_of_Matter/Atomic_and_Molecular_Properties/Intermolecular_Forces/Specific_Interactions/Van_Der_Waals_Interactions
We can see that the distance given for van der Waals binding is in agreement with the above, while that for hydrogen bonds is given as 3A (0.3nm). But this is the distance between heavy atoms, not the distance between hydrogen and hbond acceptor.
In olfaction, the majority of vdW forces are between C-H...H-C atoms. Consulting
bindings.dat
, the C-H bond is 1.09A long. Consultingelements.dat
, the vdW radius of hydrogen is 1.1A. 1.09+1.1+1.09 = 3.28, in good agreement with the usual 4A-give-or-take figure. This plus the fact that vdW repulsion is due to vdW radii makes it seem like ~4A is the distance between heavy atoms, not between H atoms.Further support for this interpretation can be found in Billesbolle (2022) in supplementary figure 6a showing the propionate ligand right up against residues of the binding pocket:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05798-y/figures/11
This figure does show carbon atoms at distances of more than 3A apart, but their hydrogen atoms are much closer together.
So I think the value in the
distance
column for vdW bonds inbindings.dat
should be less than 4A.