search

princeton-vl / RAFT-Stereo

MIT License
721 stars 139 forks source link

Questions about Table 6 #9

Closed AbnerCSZ closed 3 years ago

AbnerCSZ commented 3 years ago

In Table 6 of the paper, the 'Collapsed Cost Volume' experiment shows that RAFT-Stereo is faster than RAFT and has fewer parameters, but it does not provide 1px error on the FlyingThings3D dataset. Does RAFT-Stereo have an advantage over RAFT in accuracy?

Thanks!

lahavlipson commented 3 years ago

Regarding the 'Collapsed Cost Volume' ablation experiment, collapsing the cost volume of RAFT on its own shouldn't result in improved accuracy, hence we only report the runtime improvement in this case.

AbnerCSZ commented 3 years ago

thank you for your reply!