Closed julienlim closed 6 years ago
Those two are identical. Also Brew is our internal service, not sure whether it's a good idea to reference it in public document.
@TomasTomecek do you have a suggestion on how it can be reworded more appropriately? Right now, this requirement is not mentioned anywhere and it's not clear what the value of the com.redhat.component label should be.
How about
| com.redhat.component | Respective component name in [Red Hat Bugzilla](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/), so users can easily file bugs against this image. |
And for our internal docs, we can even mention that this is the package name inside internal koji instance.
@TomasTomecek I'm not sure it's clear enough to the user as it assumes that the image maintainer/owner knows that the BZ component name == Build system package name. Could we instead say it's the Build system package name?
@ssampat Thoughts?
@julienlim
How about then:
| com.redhat.component | Respective component name in [Red Hat Bugzilla](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/) and a package name field inside internal build system. |
@TomasTomecek I've updated the description again per your suggestion. Please review.
Thanks!
Looks good to me!
+1, I can't merge though :/
LGTM
The value of com.redhat.component label should be the same as the name of the Brew package for the container being built.
@aweiteka Please review and approve.