Closed psteinb closed 3 years ago
some nasty change indeed, that was supposed to be a feature to have the later corrections of earlier numbers included instead of just the last line added. now it seems they drop data (supposedly for "optimizing" storage or just out of bad practice) on arcgis.com
– we do not pull anything from dresden.de
.
Problem is I do not see how we can have it both ways as is, I'd say either we get just last line or take in the backward corrections. Anything else could be done manually as well. Will have a look tomorrow for doing both strategies of keeping data in separate files.
Awesome! Thanks for clarification regarding arcgis
vs dresden.de
. let me know of you progress. I plan to revamp this project
this week and potentially work on the fit.
pr ready, recently "lost" data back in place
This is great news. Thanks for investing time in this.
On 11/5/20 11:07 PM, Wolf wrote:
pr ready, recently "lost" data back in place
@vv01f I see that the automated script that pulls the data for Dresden apparently zeros out all columns except
diagnosed
. Compare 6cd762d5e346c6a77367fe8dfc2ff879d875cc66 and 6419daa46f4c2eb8621c15a291f3652b6c35910b. The diff for the latter is intriguing! it changed all rows dating back to Mar 12. This might be due to changes on dresden.de. I am not sure. Could you please have a look?