Closed codersquid closed 5 years ago
One issue is that there's no place in the schema for this data, so we need to add it.
Should we name the field "related_urls"? How about "resources"? Or "references"? Or something else? What's closer to the kind of data we're putting in there?
Once we figure out what to name the field, I'll fix clive to support the schema change and then getting help adding related urls from pyvideo would be super.
I think "resources", as a list of dictionaries containing "url" and "description" is good enough for now and possibly for a long time.
I usually link things like
In the past I may have linked an author's account somewhere such as github, twitter, etc but I have decided that is too generic and shouldn't go with a specific talk.
Closing this out since this repository is no longer active.
In pyvideo.org we have related_urls in the video scheme, but not in the data here. related_urls were added manually, by me, and there aren't that many of them. Typically I'd add a link to slides, ipython notebooks, repos. I don't know the utility of that field, so maybe we can drop it? Close this issue if that's the disposition.
If it is not, someone could write a script based on existing scripts that goes through and extracts the related_urls from the existing pyvideo.org site to make a PR. If this is done, I'd like someone to do a trial run, then have a review of the script. And then, we can decide whether it makes sense to have a big PR and merge everything all at once, or whether it is better to do some PRs with manual oversite.