Open AKB-OU opened 3 years ago
I also add a comment that the speed of MR loop calculation is as fast as that of other bands, but WT spents most of the time between the last ">> time cost for this loop is xx s" massage and next "Time cost for each k point at iband 3".
Dear Dr. Q. S. Wu and WT users,
Hi. I am just working on a calculation of angular dependence of magnetoresistance with WT. I would like to ask about the typical calculation cost and convergence of the OHE calculation.
I have already tried the tutorial of Cu and recognized that the typical calculation cost for a single magnetoresistance curve is 500-1700 sec using 80 CPU cores and 81x81x81 kmesh (calculation time seems to depend on the magnetic field direction).
Now, I am working on my target material and noticed that it requires more computational cost than Cu. I think that possible reasons are lower crystal symmetry, more Wannier basis, and more complicated FS etc. than Cu, but I recognized that WT takes extremely long time for the calculation of a specific band compared to the other bands. I show the excerpted part of output:
While bands 9, 10, and 12 are very cheap to calculate, band 11 costs 94% of the whole time! Is this reasonable behavior? or what is a possible factor that makes the calculation slow down?
In addition, could you please tell me just for my reference typical computational condition (number of CPU cores etc.), kmesh, and computational time for the cases of Bi and WP2 shown in PRB paper [PRB 99, 035142 (2019)]? I also want to know how to judge the convergence and the typical value of kmesh to obtain a well-converged output.
Best regards, AKB-OU