Open yrodiere opened 10 months ago
Now we'd have to wait for a 3.10+ as we are using the standalone mapper. And thinking more about this particular one, do we really want to stay on a RHBQ version or stay on the latest available and be able to test any new features we add to Search on a real application?
do we really want to stay on a RHBQ version or stay on the latest available and be able to test any new features we add to Search on a real application?
Depends who "we" is. Personally, I'd vote for always using the latest. But I understand the core Quarkus team may want to focus testing on LTS.
I think we'll probably end up doing this only if some compelling arguments show up, or if someone else who thinks it's a good idea actually puts in the work to maintain this project.
So... let's put this on ice.
See https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_build_of_quarkus/quarkus-3.2/guide/8c2d0754-31e2-4d6d-9d5f-9ade55c3b30d for instructions for 3.2; it'll probably be similar for later versions.
We'll want to wait for RHBQ 3.7/3.8 to be out, because migrating now would mean downgrading from Quarkus 3.6 to 3.2, and that would mean some annoying changes in tests.