IntoValue dataset: Kiel and Lübeck are merged into a single UMC (Schleswig-Holstein); whereas in the updated dataset for prospective reg in CT.gov, Kiel and Lübeck are separate UMCs (no Schleswig-Holstein) --> combine in updated CT.gov dataset?
Align city names in the IntoValue dataset and updated prospective reg dataset (e.g., Witten-Herdecke vs. Witten/Herdecke) to ensure the data appears as expected in the One UMC page