Closed delwen closed 1 year ago
Yes, I think we should just go back to the earliest data we have, rather than having this arbitrary time window of 1.5 years. Happy to change this, if we're in agreement.
Removed filter, which takes us back to December 2020 for the EUTT.
https://github.com/quest-bih/clinical-dashboard/blob/c690b317495db987fb45bf1f142c9ed80fc130e1/start_page_plots.R#L267
:wave: @ontogenerator we should keep in mind this hardcoded instance as well, depending on how far back we want to go in this plot. The previous download date is still in there, which takes you back to the earliest EUTT we can extract (December 2020). The alternative is to set that to
eutt_date
(which we did so far). But now I'm thinking why not go back to earliest data we can get.Either way, we should probably decide and change this to avoid any surprises down the line.