Closed dckc closed 5 years ago
I think we're developing the rchain module for javascript. Taking that name doesn't preclude development of rchain.py
or rchain.java
. We could even pronounce the project "RChain JS".
The one situation I can imagine making me regret the land-grab is if someone wants to develop the actual node in javascript. But I think js would be pretty far down the list preferred languages for that.
Although I'm certainly open to suggestions @dckc if you have something you like more.
Maybe rchain-client
? Or rchain-sidecar
?
I would think the rchain package for javascript would re-implement the rholang interpreter / compiler and the rest of the scala code.
I prefer less meaningful names that accrue their own reputation later rather than grabbing up front. (historical example: HTML Wilbur that later became HTML 3.2). Hmm... rchain-dapper
for building dapps? Maybe rchain-tools
? But that smells like a util package.
rchain-gang rchain-web rchain-connect
using some words from a bip39 generator: rchain-leaf rchain-bubble rchain-blossom rchain-panther
panthR
This issue was moved to rchain/rchain-api#4
In #19, @crypto-coder suggests
npm install --save rchain
. @JoshOrndorff says he likes it.Hmm... it seems like a land-grab, to me; are we really developing the rchain module?
Not that
rchain-api
was any less of a land-grab. Hmm...