Closed karlemilzt closed 2 years ago
This is certainly the case for minimum variance portfolios, that don't depend on expected returns. Otherwise, yes, optimal portfolios for different sets of returns should be different.
Oh wow, I what a blunder from my side. Thank you!
When using Mean Variance Optimisation, you always get the same output regardless of the expected returns input. This should not be the case. I have checked both for mean historical returns and CAPM-returns. I have doubled checked that the code is not wrong, and I can't find anything in the source code about it. I am pretty sure it is a bug.
Could someone please confirm which expected returns it uses?