Open MCFurry opened 4 years ago
This is probably fixed now. Can you update and re-test?
Thx, I'll try to re-evaluate asap! Is this fix in the apt-released version or do I need to test the latest source?
apt-released should have it
apt-released should have it
Please see the following example of my
diagnostic_aggregator
configuration:ecu: type: diagnostic_aggregator/GenericAnalyzer path: 'ECU' startswith: 'ecu_reporter' remove_prefix: 'ecu_reporter_node: ' ecu_discard1: type: diagnostic_aggregator/DiscardAnalyzer path: none contains: 'Error_676' ecu_discard2: type: diagnostic_aggregator/DiscardAnalyzer path: none contains: 'Error_1235'
The problem seems that no diagnostic messages coming from this node are discarded anymore now that the
GenericAnalyzer
matches them as well and groups them. There doesn't seem to be any specific ordering in processingGenericAnalyzer
vsDiscardAnalyzer
? Am I miss-using the analyzers or is there a bug here?In the end I would like to put all diagnostic messages from
ecu_reporter_node
in the same path such thatrqt_robot_monitor
groups them, unless they are discarded of course.
ok
Please see the following example of my
diagnostic_aggregator
configuration:The problem seems that no diagnostic messages coming from this node are discarded anymore now that the
GenericAnalyzer
matches them as well and groups them. There doesn't seem to be any specific ordering in processingGenericAnalyzer
vsDiscardAnalyzer
? Am I miss-using the analyzers or is there a bug here?In the end I would like to put all diagnostic messages from
ecu_reporter_node
in the same path such thatrqt_robot_monitor
groups them, unless they are discarded of course.