kontur
commented
1 year ago Thanks for the report.
@MrBrezina I've tweaked the tha orthography to not require these two marks ◌̍ ◌̎ as base marks, since at least none of the GF seem to require it and Wikipedia states that they appear only in conjunction with another combining mark (which kind of swallows them to become U+0E35?)
Just for future reference on how to list marks but not make them required as base — repeat them as auxiliary (marks is a combination of all marks, but the base/aux required ones are synthesized for the check from base, aux and marks not in either):
tha:
name: Thai
orthographies:
- autonym: ภาษาไทย
auxiliary: ◌̍ ◌̎
base: ก ข ฃ ค ฅ ฆ ง จ ฉ ช ซ ฌ ญ ฎ ฏ ฐ ฑ ฒ ณ ด ต ถ ท ธ น บ ป ผ ฝ พ ฟ ภ ม ย ร ล ว ศ ษ ส ห ฬ อ ฮ ะ า เ แ โ ใ ไ ฤ ๅ ฦ ๆ
marks: ◌̍ ◌̎ ◌ั ◌ิ ◌ุ ◌ู ◌็ ◌ํ ◌ี ◌ึ ◌ื ◌ฺ ◌่ ◌้ ◌๊ ◌๋ ◌์ ◌๎@MariannaPaszkowska Those fonts should now correctly detect Thai support :)
Hi there, I noticed today that Hyperglot might not correctly recognize Thai support in fonts that fully support Thai.
I checked and had consistent behavior on four font families, including two fonts from the GF collection: Mali and Sarabun. Hyperglot doesn't show that they have any Thai in them.