Homepage / Documentation / Report Issue / Development / Mailing list
Q.E.D. is an abbreviation for the well known Latin phrase "Quod Erat Demonstrandum", literally "which was to be demonstrated", which is oft written in its abbreviated form at the end of a mathematical proof or philosophical argument to signify a successful conclusion. And so it is too for Ruby Q.E.D., though it might as easily be taken to stand for "Quality Ensured Documentation".
QED is in fact both a test framework and a documentation system for Ruby developers. QED sits somewhere between lower-level testing tools like Test::Unit and grandiose requirement specifications systems like Cucumber. In practice it works exceptionally well for API-Driven Design, which is especially useful when designing reusable libraries, but it can be used to test code at any level of abstraction, from unit test to systems tests.
QED can use any BRASS compliant assertions framework. Simply require the library in ones applique (see below). Traditionally this has been the AE (Assertive Expressive) library, which provides an elegant means to make assertions. To give a quick overview, assertion can be written as:
4.assert == 5
In this example, because 4 != 5, this expression will raise an Assertion exception. QED's Runner class is thus just a means of running and capturing code blocks containing such assertions.
You can learn more about BRASS and AE at http://rubyworks.github.com/brass and http://rubyworks.github.com/ae, repectively.
QED documents are simply text files called demonstrandum (demos for short). Because they largely consist of free-form descriptive text, they are a practice pure Literate Programming. For example:
= Example
Shows that the number 5 does not equal 4.
5.assert! == 4
But in fact equals 5.
5.assert == 5
In this example RDoc was chosen for the document format. However, almost any text format can be used. The only necessary distinction is that description text align to the left margin and all code be indented, although QED does recognize RDoc and Markdown single-line style headers, so any format that supports those (which covers many markup formats in use today) will have mildly improved console output. In any case, the essential take away here is that QED demonstrandum are simply descriptive documents with interspersed blocks of example code.
Give this design some thought. It should become clear that this approach is especially fruitful in that it allows documentation and specification to seamlessly merge into a unified demonstration.
If we were to run the above document through QED in verbatim mode the output would be identical (assuming we did not make a typo and the assertions passed). If there were errors or failures, we would see information detailing each.
To run a document through QED, simply use the +qed+ command.
$ qed -v demo/01_example.rdoc
The -v
option specifies verbatim mode, which outputs the entire
document.
Notice we placed the QED document in a demo/
directory. This is the
canonical location, but there is no place that demonstrations have to go. They
can be placed anywhere that is preferred. However, the qed
command
will look for qed/
, demo/
, demos/
and spec/
, in that order, if no
path is given.
Also notice the use of 01_
prefix in front of the file name.
While this is not strictly necessary, QED sorts the documents, so it helps order
the documents nicely, in particular when generating QED documentation ("QEDocs").
QED demonstrandum descriptive text is not strictly passive explanation. Using pattern matching techniques, document phrases can trigger underlying actions. These actions provide a support structure for running tests called the applique.
Creating an applique is easy. Along with your QED scripts, to which the
applique will apply, create an applique/
directory. In this
directory add Ruby scripts. When you run your demos every Ruby script in
the directory will be automatically loaded.
Within these applique scripts advice can be defined. Advice can be
either event advice, which is simply triggered by some fixed cycle
of running, such as Before :each
or After :all
,
and pattern advice which are used to match against descriptive
phrases in the QED demos. An example would be:
When "a new round is started" do
@round = []
end
So that whenever the phrase "a new round is started" appears in a demo, the @round instance variable with be reset to an empty array.
It is rather amazing what can be accomplished with such a system, be sure to look at QED's own demonstrandum to get a better notion of how you can put the the system to use.
Configuration for qed
can be placed in a etc/qed.rb
file, or if
you are using Rails, in config/qed.rb
. Here's a generally useful
example of using SimpleCov to generate a test coverage report when
running your QED demos.
QED.configure 'coverage' do
require 'simplecov'
SimpleCov.start do
coverage_dir 'log/coverage'
end
end
You can then use the profile via the -p/--profile
option on the command line:
$ qed -p coverage
Or by setting the profile
environment variable.
$ profile=coverage qed
QED can also use the RC gem to handle
configuration. Be sure to gem install rc
and then add this to .rubyrc
or Config.rb
file of the same effect as given above.
config :qed, :profile=>:coverage do
require 'simplecov'
SimpleCov.start do
coverage_dir 'log/coverage'
end
end
To generate documentation from QED documents, use the +qedoc+ command.
$ qedoc --output doc/qedoc --title "Example" demo/*.rdoc
When documenting, QED recognizes the format by the file extension and
treats it accordingly. An extension of .qed
is treated the same
as .rdoc
.
Use the --help
options on each command to get more information
on the use of these commands.
QED depends on the following external libraries:
These will be automatically installed when installing QED via RubyGems, if they are not already installed.
Optional libraries that are generally useful with QED.
Install these individually and require them in your applique to use.
QED uses itself for testing, which can be a bit tricky. But works fine for the most part. In the future we may add some addition tests via another test framework to ensure full coverage. But for now QED is proving sufficient.
To run the tests, use qed
command line tool --ideally use $ ruby -Ilib bin/qed
to ensure the current version of QED is being used.
For convenience, use $ fire spec
to run the test specifications. To also
generate a test coverage report use $ fire spec:cov
.
(BSD-2-Clause license)
Copyright (c) 2009 Rubyworks. All rights reserved.
See LICENSE.txt for details.