Closed tvraman closed 9 months ago
Should it be called with all commands or with specific one only (ellama-chat, probably)?
Sergey Kostyaev @.***> writes:
I think it would be best to have a named function as the callback for each of the ellama commands -- rather than an anonymous lambda as at present. Then Emacspeak could define appropriate advice on each of them, rather than having a one-size fits all behavior on the speech-side; as an example, one might want it to automaticaly speak the response from the LLM for some commands and not others.
Should it be called with all commands or with specific one only (ellama-chat, probably)?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
--
Makes sense. Thank you.
See PR 43
If you could make ellama-prompt use ellama-default-on-done (a variable that is set to #ignore) instead of using #'ignore directly, I could then set that var to an emacspeak-specific function that plays a sound