issues
search
samuelgoto
/
proposal-block-params
A syntactical simplification in JS to enable DSLs
204
stars
8
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
transfer to tc39-transfer
#46
ljharb
opened
1 month ago
0
tc39 proposal pattern matching into userland
#45
Pyrolistical
opened
2 years ago
4
Does this replace do blocks and "explicit resource management"?
#44
theScottyJam
opened
2 years ago
0
Toss the nested block param idea
#43
theScottyJam
opened
2 years ago
0
Give up transpiling into functions
#42
theScottyJam
opened
2 years ago
0
Stop trying so hard to mimic built-in control structure syntax
#41
theScottyJam
opened
2 years ago
0
asfasfdas
#40
samuelgoto
closed
4 years ago
0
Syntax confliction
#39
hax
opened
5 years ago
1
Fix issues in template string example
#38
N8python
closed
5 years ago
0
Fix link
#37
karlhorky
closed
5 years ago
0
Fix template string example
#36
BenoitZugmeyer
closed
5 years ago
0
Proposal status
#35
macor161
closed
5 years ago
2
[Swift] Trailing closures
#34
julien-c
closed
4 years ago
0
Alternative arguments syntax
#33
vadzim
opened
6 years ago
1
Harder to learn FP basics with blocks
#32
baron816
opened
6 years ago
0
Yield handling in JS
#31
rajasekarm
closed
3 years ago
1
fix typo in README
#30
trotyl
closed
5 years ago
0
Update stage from 0 to 1.
#29
yavorsky
closed
5 years ago
0
What happens with await inside a block param?
#28
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
4
Completion value suggestion
#27
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
1
Will this corner ourselves?
#26
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
15
Can receivers change return values?
#25
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
3
Scope of `var` in the block?
#24
ljharb
opened
6 years ago
7
Should block params be allowed in construtors invocations too?
#23
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
0
Perhaps don't encourage `this` usage
#22
domenic
opened
6 years ago
2
Why do so many examples use {}s?
#21
domenic
opened
6 years ago
2
Alternative strawman
#20
dead-claudia
opened
6 years ago
8
Advantage over existing callback syntax is unclear
#19
not-an-aardvark
closed
6 years ago
2
Prototype methods that accept a callback
#18
rwaldron
opened
6 years ago
3
Syntactic look-a-likes?
#17
rwaldron
opened
6 years ago
3
Scope Questions
#16
rwaldron
opened
6 years ago
14
Syntax Questions
#15
rwaldron
opened
6 years ago
6
Async body?
#14
Ltrlg
opened
6 years ago
2
`with`-like performance concerns
#13
dead-claudia
opened
6 years ago
15
Implicit `this` binding
#12
ljharb
closed
6 years ago
5
Access arguments?
#11
dead-claudia
opened
6 years ago
15
completion value
#10
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
7
this
#9
samuelgoto
closed
6 years ago
1
continue and break
#8
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
1
How do we go about match () {}?
#7
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
5
Statements as Expressions
#6
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
0
Statements in JSX/E4X
#5
samuelgoto
opened
6 years ago
0
`do` example
#4
mathiasbynens
closed
6 years ago
1
Request: make the introduction more clear
#3
mathiasbynens
closed
6 years ago
1
README: Broken link
#2
mathiasbynens
closed
6 years ago
1
Would it be possible to implement this as a babel plugin?
#1
samuelgoto
opened
7 years ago
13