Open seenanair opened 4 months ago
I guess that we should also prevent users from scanning labware into or out of locations that have been soft-deleted?
Just on Katy's point. I can see the point of preventing or warning people scanning labware into a soft-deleted location.
I am less sure why we would prevent users scanning labware currently in a soft-deleted location out of it or into another location ?
If we did prevent them - what would we expect them to do next? What errors are we preventing?
@TWJW-SANGER @KatyTaylor Hmm, that brings up another question: should we allow deletion of locations with labware inside them or should we prompt users to move the labware elsewhere before deletion?
And if you soft delete locations with other locations inside them, does it also soft delete the child locations?
Scanning out:
Scanning into another location:
Child locations:
@KatyTaylor @TWJW-SANGER Updated story with your feedback.
User story As a LabWhere user, I would like to soft delete a location that may no longer be in use or is misspelled. This allows for a cleaner UI and avoids unnecessary location names dangling around.
Who are the primary contacts for this story Tristram Bellerby
Acceptance criteria To be considered successful the solution must allow: