Closed agriffis closed 1 year ago
I do agree. I will add it in the next release.
It is done, but TS definitions will be worse than those of @types/ramda
because it is using ts-toolbelt
, while Rambda is not using it in order to have simpler and easier to maintain TS code.
published with 9.1.0
Not a big deal, but would be nice for conversion from Ramda.
https://ramdajs.com/docs/#unnest