Open tylergets opened 7 years ago
I'd love to implement this. Thanks for the heads up!
It has been 11 months, has there been any progress on this?
@lukyjay no. The short-term goal is to ensure that all of the existing crawlers work properly, then I will take a look at that. I'll ping you when it's implemented.
Happy Holidays.
@lukyjay Implementing a Torznab API crawler would go against our "Run without ceremony" goal. This is a self-hosted service so each user would have to enter an endpoint URL and perhaps API credentials. We currently do not have a mechanism to start/stop crawlers at runtime, so we cannot include a torznab crawler that wouldn't be bothering users who don't use it. I'm closing this issue for now, we'll open it when it becomes technically possible to provide a Torznab crawler.
Hey @tchoutri of course as a contributor you have the deciding voice here, but I think you're misunderstanding what this ticket is about. Implementing a Torznab-compatible API means that a GET request to
https://my.magnetissimo.instance/api?t=search&cat=..,..&q=Anime+Title+123
would return an XML with search results in the already harvested magnets. It's just a different format for requesting searches. OP is not requesting that you crawl torznab-compatible services (or so I think).
Right, this we can do most definitely. It's just spitting out Torznad formatted XML.
Oh then it's not a problem at all. :)
It's been a ludicrous amount of time but I'm going to tackle this tomorrow. 👿
@sergiotapia Was this finally added? If so, how can I add it to *arr? I'm just getting an error when I try to connect (I'm using http://x.x.x.x:4000/api
)
@sergiotapia Was this finally added? If so, how can I add it to *arr? I'm just getting an error when I try to connect (I'm using
http://x.x.x.x:4000/api
)
He said he'd make a start, not finish 🙂
@ldexterldesign I believe issue #145 was closed because it's a duplicate of this.
BUMP
If this issue gets done then can setup prowlarr, integrate with the other *arr apps and start making use of this app 🙂
Then I would do https://github.com/sergiotapia/magnetissimo/issues/162
Regards
👋 @sergiotapia,
Hope you're OK!
Thanks for continued work on this
Did you mean to create a duplicate issue?
Is sonarr et al. supported yet..?: if yes then I'll update and have a play 👀
Yours hopefully
It would be awesome to the support the Torznab api, as it would allow many automation tools to work with this project.
Here is documentation from Sonarr, an automation tool. https://github.com/Sonarr/Sonarr/wiki/Implementing-a-Torznab-indexer