Closed jmandel closed 3 years ago
@GUI FYI
Thanks! Yeah, hopefully this will help clarify things for publishers.
Would a more concrete example maybe help clarify how the UTC zone should be used? I understand what this says, but given the fact that most of the sample data so far includes the Z
specifier (so is therefore compliant), but perhaps isn't using it correctly, I'm just wondering if this could use more clarification to help publishers. Or maybe I shouldn't be reading as much into the sample data we have have so far, and maybe this could be addressed with the validator tool looking for suspicious times. But maybe including an explicit example like:
For example, to represent a start time of 10:45AM in
America/New_York
on 2021-04-21, this could be returned as either2021-04-21T10:45:00.000-04:00
or2021-04-21T14:45:00.000Z
.
But I know I can also be overly-verbose, so it's also fine if you don't think the extra additions are needed. :) I think the changes you have will also help clarify the situation.
I think verbose is good here; will incorporate an example, thanks for the suggestion!
Based on discussion at https://chat.fhir.org/#narrow/stream/281612-smart.2Fscheduling-links/topic/Time.20zones.20for.20slots.2C.20locations