Closed jsdbroughton closed 9 months ago
Could be considered with https://github.com/specklesystems/speckle-sharp/issues/1777 for a common pattern/implementation/protocol
Closing this ticket as we are moving to Jira to reduce noise. You can access it there.
What package are you referring to?
Requested for Revit, but implementation pattern to replicable.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
All connectors aside from Grasshopper/Dynamo and custom SDK implementations send all converted object property data. There is an expressed need for some control over this is needed for various reasons:
Describe the solution you'd like
Somehow applying a filter/mask to object properties and not send to server.
Describe alternatives you've considered
How the ability to mask properties from serialisation and sending could be a standardised contract transmitted by file or stream properties.
Filter on receive - by contract If the contract is applied at the server layer, this could decouple implementation from all connectors development. For example, a shared stream endpoint could be a nominated contract (combination of streamId and filter), and therefore the object data is all present in the DB, but the data is filtered on receive; controlled by the contract.
Additional context
The closest equivalent is the MVD for IFC. https://technical.buildingsmart.org/standards/ifc/mvd/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SwNak6RkQKM
Related issues or community discussions
How to set the data of each component of a stream?