Closed jhdempsey86 closed 2 months ago
@jhdempsey86 is this in draft for a reason? We're cutting a new 2.20 version today
Sorry for the delay, but its now ready, after switchign the data type to a nullable double (double?) Hopefully it can make it into 2.21 release
There is currently an issue with the Excel Connector whenever i try and download data from a commit that contains a corridor that has been pushed using the updated code above.
Its unclear what's happening as I can see when I select a commit that some data is downloaded, (im guessing the graphical model) but then the model is never displayed and you see the loading circle indefinitly. I dont think its related to the data or metadata because i am unable to even click the recieve button to even start downloading that data
@clairekuang do you want me to raise a separate bug report on this?
@clairekuang do you want me to raise a separate bug report on this?
Is this still the case when changing the adjustedElevation
to null
instead of double.NaN
?
A separate issue is preferred if this is a big problem for you, and please include a link to the Speckle commit/version of the corridor you pushed with double.NaN
values on that commit, or a link to the civil3d file of the corridor
@clairekuang do you want me to raise a separate bug report on this?
Is this still the case when changing the
adjustedElevation
tonull
instead ofdouble.NaN
? A separate issue is preferred if this is a big problem for you, and please include a link to the Speckle commit/version of the corridor you pushed withdouble.NaN
values on that commit, or a link to the civil3d file of the corridor
Yes, its still an issue even when AdjustElevation is set to null. I will raise a separate bug. Its a big issue for us because we ideally need the Excel tool as part of our workflow (its much easier to get the Guids of objects through excel rather than manually via the viewer)
Description & motivation
Fixes #3516
Changes:
If accessing the Civil3D AppliedAssembly.AdjustedElevation property throws an error, then Speckle fails to send the whole corridor. Now defaults to sending double.NaN for this value if this occurs
If a featureline only has one point, then trying to get the spline representation of it would throw an error. Adjust code to check the featureline has more than one point, rather than more than zero.
To-do before merge:
There is no issue with the corridors now being saved in Speckle, and being able to view the corridors in the web viewer. However, the Excel connector and the python connectors seem to
Screenshots:
Validation of changes:
Checklist: