Test cases named using solely their timestamp should be renamed and thoroughly documented, because otherwise they aren't exactly helpful (especially since some of these aren't shrunk as far as they could have been). If the documentation eludes us, then we should just delete these.
This is my bad, I should have set a better precedent when I started building the test suite.
A related nice-to-have would be to improve the regression test naming scheme, and use something more pronounce-able than UNIX timestamps (though it should still be random enough that we could rely on their uniqueness for future parallel testing/CI)
Test cases named using solely their timestamp should be renamed and thoroughly documented, because otherwise they aren't exactly helpful (especially since some of these aren't shrunk as far as they could have been). If the documentation eludes us, then we should just delete these.
This is my bad, I should have set a better precedent when I started building the test suite.
A related nice-to-have would be to improve the regression test naming scheme, and use something more pronounce-able than UNIX timestamps (though it should still be random enough that we could rely on their uniqueness for future parallel testing/CI)