In sorting of holds list, ready holds should be listed ahead of unready holds

stevenyvr987 / overdrive-evergreen-opac

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/overdrive-evergreen-opac

0 stars 0 forks source link

In sorting of holds list, ready holds should be listed ahead of unready holds #35

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Currently, the holds list is sorted by hold position and expiration date.
Perhaps sorting should take account of suspended holds and holds ready to check 
out. Sort ready holds first, then normal holds, then suspended holds. Within 
each group, sort by position and expiration date.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by steven3...@gmail.com on 14 Aug 2014 at 9:46

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Fixed.

Still sorting by position and expiration, which works for the most part, except 
when there are ready holds, in which case, ready holds will be mixed together 
with unready holds that are at position one. In this case, the better sort is 
to list ready holds first.

Original comment by steven3...@gmail.com on 15 Aug 2014 at 8:06

Changed state: Started

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven3...@gmail.com on 16 Aug 2014 at 7:46

Changed title: In sorting of holds list, holds ready to be checked out should appear first

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven3...@gmail.com on 17 Aug 2014 at 5:15

Changed title: In sorting of holds list, ready holds should be listed ahead of unready holds

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by steven3...@gmail.com on 20 Aug 2014 at 2:32

Changed state: Fixed