Closed sumogr closed 4 years ago
Any lower number for ringsize can we follow so that not all improvement in processing speed would be eaten up by that increase?
Any lower number for ringsize can we follow so that not all improvement in processing speed would be eaten up by that increase?
@quangvu3 Of course. We can decrease below 59 or we cannot go at all for an increase and do it on a later stage. We have the highest ringsize of all cryptonotes at the moment and the absolute safe is 100+ which we cannot reach at the moment due to processing speed. What do you suggest?
My only concern is abt "triptych", any lower number than 59 would satisfy it?
Actually electronero coins have 100 mixins
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 4:33 AM Sumo Gr notifications@github.com wrote:
Any lower number for ringsize can we follow so that not all improvement in processing speed would be eaten up by that increase?
@quangvu3 https://github.com/quangvu3 Of course. We can decrease below 59 or we cannot go at all for an increase and do it on a later stage. We have the highest ringsize of all cryptonotes at the moment and the absolute safe is 100+ which we cannot reach at the moment due to processing speed. What do you suggest?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/sumoprojects/sumokoin/pull/1142#issuecomment-702600535, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBQBZ2B7YMSIJIILRXBMJLSIWF6ZANCNFSM4RWIDHHA .
Actually electronero coins have 100 mixins … On Fri, Oct 2, 2020, 4:33 AM Sumo Gr @.***> wrote: Any lower number for ringsize can we follow so that not all improvement in processing speed would be eaten up by that increase? @quangvu3 https://github.com/quangvu3 Of course. We can decrease below 59 or we cannot go at all for an increase and do it on a later stage. We have the highest ringsize of all cryptonotes at the moment and the absolute safe is 100+ which we cannot reach at the moment due to processing speed. What do you suggest? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1142 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADBQBZ2B7YMSIJIILRXBMJLSIWF6ZANCNFSM4RWIDHHA .
lol way to go electronero. How many hours does it take to create an electronero tx?
closing this we will increase the ringsize more in the near future
CLSAG (compact signature scheme) will decrease the tx size by 25% and improve the tx verification performance by 20%. the current 49 ringsize seems to give reasonable tx sizes and verification speed so we can increase it by almost 20% (to 59) along with the implementation of CLSAG. Also added a consistent ringsize implementation as per Monero (it was checked by MLSAG (CLSAG) verification anyhow) Next ringsize increase will be at "triptych" implementation which is way further up the road