taboca / browser-adaptation-dynamic-theme

UX study — A Browser Plug-in Enabling Toolbar Color Adaptation based on Web Page Meta data or Color Capture (ambiance)
21 stars 9 forks source link

Adapting the browser toolbar based on web sites & an user experience experiment for Firefox

Project introduction

This project features a Dynamic Theme for Firefox, launched alongside with the Extensions Challenge effort and the Firefox Quantum Edition. In this page, you can access demonstrations, understand the project from a more holistic view, and access the Add-on code.

This is a prototype for a Firefox theme, however using a UX-oriented mindset; this project is aimed as a reflection, therefore it's beyond its initial code. The Add-on experiment is currently available for Firefox Quantum and published at Chameleon Dynamic Theme Firefox Add-on.

The idea is to consider how a browser can/should blend with the actual content that the user is visiting, and to specially consider the dichotomy between external and internal browser pages.

Screenshots and use cases

Automatically matches with master header

Browser blends with tab content's navbar — when the user visited Mozilla.org

Browser content pages

Compatible with the meta-tag "theme-color" similar to Chrome in Android

What it does and why it does?

This dynamic theme adapts the browser main theme (toolbar) to web sites or content from sites. The aim of the project is to explore a phenomena that can be perceived as immersion experience. When an user is visiting a web site she or he in fact partially surrender an interface to the site. The proposition here, or a provocation since we don't know yet this is ideal or not, is to allow a reflection — can or should a web site also affect the browser interface partially?

This can be a complex discussion exactly because the user needs a resting place, a place to be safe when navigating the web. Since the user can eventually stumble in malicious web content, there is always the question about how the browser interfaces endorses the content.

Nevertheless, this project is here so we can explore the good opportunities, first. Can we imagine a safe web and if so would it make sense to have the browser fully adapt to the site? Of course, once you allow yourself to reason about that; it's of course quite important to reason about the negative aspects as well.

Collateral intentions of the project

Discussions

Calculations

Currently, the calculation for theme color setting is based in page screen capture or alternatively page analysis depending on a user preference (meta theme-color). Some other approaches should be considered in the future:

Proxy or filter for the page

While site data is critical in this project, some initial pref work was done to demonstrate that the user could also define how the orchestration happen. At this stage the user can enable/disable:

Other possible user-custom features could include:

When a theme information is present in an HTML page

There are existing solutions and emerging proposals in place and some degree of compatibility offered by other browser projects. One of the currently wotking is the "theme-color" which works for Chrome in Android according to Support for theme-color in Chrome 39 for Android. From the Google groups check Intent to Implement and ship: brand-color meta tag which dates from 2014. From the Apple side, consider [Apple-Specific Meta Tag Keys: apple-mobile-web-app-status-bar-style]. In the Mozilla front consider the bug Add meta name="theme-color" to have configurable status bar color.

The theme identity for "chrome" or browser pages

When the user is visiting the browser itself, the same idea would apply and perhaps a step further could be accomplished. At this stage we propose the bottom border of the toolbar to be removed but perhaps a background identify would overflow from the page to the browser bar, like a water mark perhaps proving that both content and the browser bars as the same.

Android Status Bar Color Setting from Apps

Inverting Page Contents Inverts Toolbars

Adapting the Firefox Theme to the Operating System

Other

Analysis of Add-ons as a distribution channel

Since this is an experiment, yet functional within the guides of Mozilla Add-ons framework, I had also the chance to reflect about the actual channel of distribution, the Mozilla Add-ons web site.

When working in publishing the Add-on, again, as an experiment; I noticed a mindset: a publisher or author, aiming to connect with potential early adopters, aiming to connect with developers, aiming to connect with UX experienced professionals; willing to expand the realm of UX discussions around a work. As an example, I have decided to add screenshots as means to discuss specific cases — screenshots of the user visiting the browser internal pages versus screenshots of an user visiting external sites; screenshots of the user visiting a site where the content shows a navbar, and more.

When working with a view oriented to the UX discussion, however, I have allowed myself to stumble into the analysis of reviewing, or less naively, reflecting about the role of the Add-ons site itself.

My first naive thought was — oh, after about 10 years without visiting Add-ons, I confess surprised it's sort of the same thing.

But a less naive reflection is more like a subtle proposition — could Add-ons become a place for scaling extensions and ideas? what UI elements and social network key indicators could help to better match tests, usage, feedback, discussions around the development for next generation features?

A lot of developers, specially within the Mozilla realm, really understand that Add-on space have always served the purpose of evolving Firefox — however in a chaotic way — which Mozilla always benefited even if one or other developer-user had no idea how they have participated in the chain.

I wonder if it would be possible to better integrate Add-ons, APIs, tests and the community to improve how new UX insights could be evaluated and evolve.