Closed axxroytovu closed 1 month ago
Oh fun. So count
was working on query level, not sheet
level.
I think use
already worked before, if you used any
+query
. use
+any
didn't work because it was passed to any
, and any
didn't do anything with it.
I added count
on sheet level, and there are some real fun results now:
Expected query is:front is:foil (e:acr r:m (-is:foilonly -number:/z/) (frame:showcase or is:borderless)) to return 13, got 14
Expected query is:front is:foil (e:acr r:r frame:extendedart) to return 16, got 17
clb/extended_commander: Expected sheet to have 26 cards, got 27
clb/etched_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 32 cards, got 36
clb/foil_showcase_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 44 cards, got 113
clb/foil_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 22 cards, got 99
clb/background: Expected sheet to have 26 cards, got 25
cmr/etched_foil: Expected sheet to have 101 cards, got 100
dmu/foil_alt_border_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 76 cards, got 80
dmu/showcase_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 46 cards, got 50
dmu/legendary_uncommon: Expected sheet to have 20 cards, got 40
dsk/test1: Expected sheet to have 20 cards, got 169
dsk/test2: Expected sheet to have 10 cards, got 169
mh2/etched_common_uncommon: Expected sheet to have 42 cards, got 43
mh2/etched_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 58 cards, got 60
mom/sfc_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 54 cards, got 118
mom/dfc_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 10 cards, got 20
mom/showcase_wild: Expected sheet to have 80 cards, got 64
mom/foil_showcase: Expected sheet to have 139 cards, got 85
unf/foil_rare_mythic: Expected sheet to have 135 cards, got 59
I added this file to test data/boosters/dsk-test.yaml
, but it looks like we have a lot of existing warnings triggering everywhere:
test1: 1
test2: 1
sheets:
test1:
filter: "e:dsk"
use: rare_mythic
count: 20
test2:
any:
- rawquery: "e:dsk r:m"
rate: 1
- rawquery: "e:dsk r:r"
rate: 2
count: 10
Is this merged? Id also like to use this on the RVR collector booster updates I'm making to fix #333
Yes, it's merged. Should I keep this issue open until the list of mismatches above gets cleaned up, or would it take long and be better as a separate issue?
If I don't get around to fixing these over the weekend I'll make a separate issue. You can leave it open until then just so I have the tracking.
OK, so that all got cleaned up, nice job.
Yeah it was a good exercise. Some places I had my counts wrong and some places had an extra card that shouldn't have been there.
Input:
Expected behavior:
Expected {something?} to return 10 got 70
Expected {something?} to return 10 got 70
Current behavior: No error