issues
search
tc39
/
proposal-type-annotations
ECMAScript proposal for type syntax that is erased - Stage 1
https://tc39.es/proposal-type-annotations/
4.27k
stars
47
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Types as comments without changing JavaScript syntax.
#176
azder
opened
1 year ago
52
docs(readme): update link to parameter properties
#175
nicojs
closed
1 year ago
0
Suggestion: Make optional parameter syntax to be less specific.
#174
msadeqhe
closed
1 year ago
7
An invitation to reconsider runtime semantics
#173
theScottyJam
opened
1 year ago
28
A high-level view of general directions this proposal can take
#172
theScottyJam
opened
1 year ago
13
Type annotations won't unfork JavaScript
#171
eemeli
opened
1 year ago
12
[FAQ] Updates
#170
romulocintra
opened
1 year ago
0
[Website] Updates
#169
romulocintra
opened
1 year ago
1
[Recommendation] Outline technical reasons for why JSDocs isn't suitable
#168
markcellus
opened
1 year ago
22
consider namespace
#167
unional
opened
1 year ago
41
Please don't pollute the specification... Unnecessarily.
#166
ioucyf
opened
1 year ago
53
Consider ecmascript-types instead
#164
jimmywarting
closed
1 year ago
9
Type annotations missions is still not clear
#163
secretjshero
closed
2 years ago
25
Avoid locking in "Kinds of Types"
#162
peey
opened
2 years ago
1
Could this RFC prevent innovation?
#161
Ayc0
closed
2 years ago
7
Notation of types
#160
w3nl
closed
2 years ago
4
Type annotations as metadata in decorators
#159
jithujoshyjy
opened
2 years ago
4
Get the current "state" of this proposal (feature of JS)?
#158
birgersp
opened
2 years ago
1
Skipping transpilation won't discourage minifying
#157
dfabulich
closed
1 year ago
1
Clarify Motivation
#156
dfabulich
closed
1 year ago
7
type-annotations should only be enabled in the JS engine by the developer, during development, using a browser extension or flag. It should never be enabled by default for users!
#155
lukaszpolowczyk
opened
2 years ago
42
Update readme
#154
romulocintra
closed
1 year ago
1
Shaky arguments made in favor of this proposal on the repo's main page
#153
DavidJCobb
opened
2 years ago
1
Higher Kinded Types
#152
Caleb-T-Owens
opened
2 years ago
5
JSDoc typing example: FunctionScript
#151
keithwhor
opened
2 years ago
5
as keyword
#150
aliibrahim123
opened
2 years ago
7
Add type annotations as metadata
#149
zsakowitz
opened
2 years ago
7
Research: Overlap with existing ES grammar
#148
acutmore
opened
2 years ago
3
Suggestion: use decorators to specify types
#147
brad4d
opened
2 years ago
11
Alternate Proposal: Reversable Type Annotations
#146
matthew-dean
closed
2 years ago
7
Type files
#145
prettydiff
opened
2 years ago
9
Allow type parameters on variable declarations
#144
Superstar64
opened
2 years ago
4
How is this proposal better than Source Maps?
#143
codedread
opened
2 years ago
15
Non-null assertion unnecessary for proposal
#142
ckknight
opened
2 years ago
8
Update links with changed repository name
#141
738
closed
2 years ago
0
Higher order type parameter support
#140
xiaoxiangmoe
closed
2 years ago
1
Re-deploy site to github pages
#139
shayneo
closed
2 years ago
1
Updating HTTP links in README.md to use HTTPS
#138
Schweinepriester
closed
2 years ago
0
Add more prior art
#137
dfabulich
closed
2 years ago
2
Counter proposal: Is a strong type system really impossible for JavaScript?
#136
theScottyJam
closed
1 year ago
17
Remove incorrect information about impossibility of evolution of JS type system
#135
guitarino
closed
2 years ago
22
Arguments in favor of abandoning/rejecting this proposal.
#134
lillallol
closed
2 years ago
5
fix link to grammar
#133
Rich-Harris
closed
2 years ago
0
Update to Stage 1
#132
DanielRosenwasser
closed
2 years ago
2
Disclaimer for type annotations
#131
DanielRosenwasser
closed
2 years ago
0
Scope Analysis
#130
jamiebuilds
opened
2 years ago
10
Why type syntax cannot be separated from future type-check implementation
#129
guitarino
opened
2 years ago
19
stringsStringsStrings example is incomplete
#128
pentacular
closed
2 years ago
2
A concrete, smaller proposal: make more use of `:`
#127
bakkot
opened
2 years ago
30
Redirect to tentative grammar
#126
DanielRosenwasser
closed
2 years ago
0
Previous
Next