We should change the example collection dynamics, because it's unnecessarily confusing. Looking back at the working group notes, this statusType was meant for statuses that reflect the capacity of the collection to change in size or scope over time. e.g., static, developing, passive growth, consumable, ...
To do:
change the example from collection dynamics to growth status in the termlist csv.
See notes from 16th Feb 23 and 9th Feb (review meeting). Original def: #367 Current master def: ltc_standard_terms_draft.csv
We should change the example
collection dynamics, because it's unnecessarily confusing. Looking back at the working group notes, this statusType was meant for statuses that reflect the capacity of the collection to change in size or scope over time. e.g., static, developing, passive growth, consumable, ...To do:
collection dynamicstogrowth statusin the termlist csv.