Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
This will probably need some more cleanup for things like:
'ITypeLib' : [ 0x4, {
'òñ^Q^U^[' : [ 0x0, ['IUnknown']], <- binary stuff
} ],
'ITypeInfo' : [ 0x4, {
'òñ^Q^U^[' : [ 0x0, ['IUnknown']],
} ],
'IRecordInfo' : [ 0x4, {
'òñ^Q^U^[' : [ 0x0, ['IUnknown']],
} ],
[skip]
I think "<unnamed-type-u>::<unnamed-type-s>" will give a problem:
'_TP_CALLBACK_ENVIRON_V1::<unnamed-type-u>::<unnamed-type-s>' : [ 0x4, {
'LongFunction' : [ 0x0, ['BitField', dict(start_bit = 0, end_bit = 1, native_type='unsigned long')]],
'Persistent' : [ 0x0, ['BitField', dict(start_bit = 1, end_bit = 2, native_type='unsigned long')]],
'Private' : [ 0x0, ['BitField', dict(start_bit = 2, end_bit = 32, native_type='unsigned long')]],
} ],
etc. otherwise looks interesting
Original comment by jamie.l...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2012 at 6:26
Ah, that's what I was referring to as "unnecessary/unrelated stuff at the
top"....we'd actually only need lines below 2260 in that file (so starting with
the _IMAGE_OS2_HEADER struct). In other words, just the PE related structs, not
all the other stuff.
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2012 at 8:26
ah ok. here's a new copy w/o those lines then
Original comment by jamie.l...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2012 at 8:31
Attachments:
actually we still have things like <unnamed-type-N>::<unnamed-type-Name> in the
lines you requested
Original comment by jamie.l...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2012 at 8:33
Ah yeah, this attached one is more likely what we need, but there's still some
unfamiliar stuff in the ImageThunkData structs. I'll pass this along to BDG on
the pdbparse site and see what he thinks.
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2012 at 11:12
Attachments:
Just adding mooyix
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 8 Jul 2012 at 12:07
At this time, I don't think we really have a need for auto-generated types. I
think scudette has done some work with PE vtypes, so when 3.0 comes along, we
should be pretty well off...and we can always reopen this if needed.
Original comment by michael.hale@gmail.com
on 1 Feb 2013 at 5:01
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
michael.hale@gmail.com
on 6 Jul 2012 at 5:28Attachments: