Closed ironsheep closed 3 years ago
I think it should be possible to ignore the DEBUG() statements in PASM code. For various reasons I doubt they'll ever do anything useful in flexspin. I'd rather see a proper single step debugger.
(DEBUG() does partially work in Spin2 code inside flexspin).
debug() is ignored now in PASM code, as of 5.0.1
Just a tiny compatibility issue.
What are you planning to do with the debug() statements that Chip supports?
I just got a compile error "error: syntax error, unexpected DEBUG" for my having debug() statements in the DAT section (pasm2 code).
It would be nice not to have to comment these out as it would mean that I have to edit my code depending upon which compiler I'm using.