Closed peterdesmet closed 5 years ago
I asked Hugo, he agrees to update the scientific names. Will adapt this asap.
These two synonyms are now handled in the verification of the unified checklist (accepting the proposed synonymy by GBIF). There is no longer a need to update these in this checklist. In fact, it might be better to keep the original names. Closing issue.
See: https://github.com/trias-project/unified-checklist/commit/c48b1d891f49c18dc90cfbf668ae8d9b98677d89
The following taxa are considered synonyms by GBIF. For each: ask Hugo if it's OK to a) update in the xls our scientific name to the accepted species or b) keep our current species name
Aspius aspius
(https://www.gbif.org/species/2360181) is considered a synonym ofLeuciscus aspius
(https://www.gbif.org/species/5851603)Acipenser guldenstaedti
... actually written asAcipenser güldenstaedti
(https://www.gbif.org/species/2402131) is considered a synonym ofAcipenser gueldenstaedtii
(https://www.gbif.org/species/2402129)