Update scientific names to their accepted name?

[peterdesmet]

The following taxa are considered synonyms by GBIF. For each: ask Hugo if it's OK to a) update in the xls our scientific name to the accepted species or b) keep our current species name

• [ ] Aspius aspius (https://www.gbif.org/species/2360181) is considered a synonym of Leuciscus aspius (https://www.gbif.org/species/5851603)
• [ ] Acipenser guldenstaedti... actually written as Acipenser güldenstaedti (https://www.gbif.org/species/2402131) is considered a synonym of Acipenser gueldenstaedtii (https://www.gbif.org/species/2402129)

[LienReyserhove]

I asked Hugo, he agrees to update the scientific names. Will adapt this asap.

[peterdesmet]

These two synonyms are now handled in the verification of the unified checklist (accepting the proposed synonymy by GBIF). There is no longer a need to update these in this checklist. In fact, it might be better to keep the original names. Closing issue.

See: https://github.com/trias-project/unified-checklist/commit/c48b1d891f49c18dc90cfbf668ae8d9b98677d89