Closed LienReyserhove closed 3 months ago
Checked today with @LienReyserhove: this issue persists.
I checked this with the pathway controlled vocabulary list of terms on the TDWG website, it appears that unintentional
is a valid term after all, see here. So I think this issue is resolved.
Yes, with the last changes to the DwC we should review indeed all the pathway information.
In the
description.csv
extension, I mapped the original pathways (e.g.active migration
to the CBD standard (e.g.cbd_2014_pathway:corridor_water
. However, for the original pathwayunintentional
, I couldn't find a good CBD alternative. This could be due to an escape, a contaminant, stowaway,... Any good suggestions, or do I contact Hugo Verreycken for the interpretation?