Open pbinkley opened 9 years ago
As admin, I want the justification field in audit entries always to contain an informative log entry, so that the audit trail is complete.
This is a reference to Fedora 3's audit trail, and we'll need a new issue for Fedora 4. In Fedora 3 we ended up with audit entries like this:
<audit:record ID="AUDREC4"> <audit:process type="Fedora API-M"/> <audit:action>addDatastream</audit:action> <audit:componentID>RELS-EXT</audit:componentID> <audit:responsibility>fedoraAdmin</audit:responsibility> <audit:date>2000-01-01T00:00:00.000Z</audit:date> <audit:justification>ERA: Action[/action/submit] Username[admin] WorkflowState[Archive] - Archive</audit:justification> </audit:record>
We want the audit entries to be actually descriptive of the action that was performed, the user who performed it, and the reason for it.
@pbinkley requires clarification so @leahvanderjagt can prioritize. Can you provide some more info?
As admin, I want the justification field in audit entries always to contain an informative log entry, so that the audit trail is complete.
This is a reference to Fedora 3's audit trail, and we'll need a new issue for Fedora 4. In Fedora 3 we ended up with audit entries like this:
We want the audit entries to be actually descriptive of the action that was performed, the user who performed it, and the reason for it.