Closed lydiayliu closed 2 years ago
right now the pure "Noncoding" count is 0, maybe add the option to input a noncoding.fasta just like splitFasta? I think it's nice to have all the numbers in the same place
Thought about this, but isn't that just a simple grap -c >
can do?
The "impossible" data type combinations can be eliminated? Like there would NEVER be a circ2-starfusion peptide and those take up quite a few lines and could be misleading
Sure, but also this can be done by a simple command with awk to remove everything of 0?
Those are reasonable arguments so I'll add them in
I know I'm extremely annoying, how hard is it to output these summary numbers by # of miscleavages? XD
What do you need it for? We could search for number of cleavage sites for each peptide, because we currently don't have that information in the FASTA header.
For plotting XD as always
I feel like this would be good info to show in a database overview barplot
Yeah OK, that makes sense!
right now the pure "Noncoding" count is
0
, maybe add the option to input a noncoding.fasta just likesplitFasta
? I think it's nice to have all the numbers in the same placeThe "impossible" data type combinations can be eliminated? Like there would NEVER be a
circ2-starfusion
peptide and those take up quite a few lines and could be misleadingResult on real data
btw also seeing
starfusion = 0
on all 4 of the cpcg test samples... I'm looking into it