Closed pk-work closed 9 months ago
There's a build issue related to this change
Yes, because this [1] interface is not public. But this is intended. Maybe we can remove the @VertxGen
annotation from the interface?
If a type is not part of the public API, I don't believe it should be annotated with @VertxGen
Le ven. 20 oct. 2023 à 16:14, Pascal @.***> a écrit :
Yes, because this [1] interface is not public. But this is intended. Maybe we can remove the @VertxGen annotation from the interface?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/vert-x3/vertx-rx/pull/298#issuecomment-1772819489, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALOLNS4WNPLOHCSVSB6E43YAKBLHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6I5345GVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONZSHAYTSNBYHE . You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID: @.***>
Add rx2 and rx3 support for vertx-web-openapi-router