Closed dcy closed 6 years ago
Is it intentional that the new commit doesn't contain only one of the changes in the original commit (the rebar lock part)?
Original commit have conflict because i use rebase
by wrong way. I make a new one.
You rebased correctly, so I merged the PR. I didn't notice that the change that is present only on the original commit (the rebar lock part) was already inlcuded in an existing commit (bcdb1de8aeee2b1b1b7baf4162321d16efd092d0).
Thanks!
In rebar, we might have the following files:
xx.erl may contain
include("xx.hrl")
. This works in rebar, and now it also works in vim-erlang-compiler.