ObjectiveMixin allows Objective-C classes to receive additional functionality at runtime, similar to the way Ruby mixins work. You can extend a class using methods defined in some other class, and gain that class's functionality for free. Since Objective-C doesn't support multiple inheritance, this can be quite useful at times when subclassing isn't an option and protocols don't do exactly what you want.
This works by taking advantage of the Objective-C runtime environment and its ability to add methods to an existing class while the program is executing. By specifying source and destination classes when performing a "mixing" operation, the destination class gains all of the source class's method implementations.
There's a small limitation due to the fact that instance variables cannot be added after the class pair is created (see Apple docs for class_addIvar
). Thus, the source class's method implementations must not contain direct references to instance variables. This can be easily circumvented by accessing ivars through properties instead of accessing them directly (i.e. self.someValue
instead of someValue
). The runtime will then synthesize the property in the destination instance (instance, not class!) and will work normally.
Mixin.h
and Mixin.m
into your project.#import "Mixin.h"
Say you have a source class that looks like this:
@interface Ninja : NSObject {
NSString* clanName;
}
@property (nonatomic, retain) NSString* clanName;
- (void) doNinjaStuff;
@end
@implementation Ninja
@synthesize clanName;
- (void) doNinjaStuff {
self.clanName = @"Iga";
NSLog(@"I'm a %@ and my clan name is %@", [[self class] description], self.clanName);
}
@end
If you then use Mixin
to extend Turtle
with Ninja
, you get this:
Turtle* turtle = [[Turtle alloc] init];
[Mixin from:[Ninja class] into:[Turtle class]];
[(id)turtle doNinjaStuff]; // Prints "I'm a Turtle and my clan name is Iga"
Even though the clanName
instance variable does not exist in Turtle
's definition, it is synthesized at runtime in the turtle
object, and everything works fine.
Note that in order to avoid "object may not respond to selector" compiler warnings you have to cast the turtle
variable to the id
type (or alternatively, to Ninja
, but id
is cleaner in my opinion). Read the next section to see how to avoid this.
You can also use [Mixin from:[Ninja class] into:[Turtle class] followInheritance:YES];
to mix in all Ninja
's inherited methods, up to the common ancestor of Ninja
and Turtle
. In other words, if we have the following inheritance trees: Ninja -> Human -> NSObject
and Turtle -> NSObject
, then the from:into:followInheritance:
method will mix in methods from both Ninja
and Human
into Turtle
, but not from NSObject
since it's their common ancestor (they already inherit its methods).
There's also a convenient category defined on top of NSObject
(it's defined in Mixin.h
as well), so you can use it instead of calling Mixin
class methods:
Turtle* turtle = [[turtle alloc] init];
[turtle mixinFrom:[Ninja class]]; // Or mixinFrom:followInheritance:
[(id)turtle doNinjaStuff]; // Prints "I'm a Turtle and my clan name is Iga"
Be aware that this is just syntactic sugar - even though the method is called on an object instance, it still extends the class itself. I actually prefer using the Mixin
class, since it is more clear by reading the code that you're extending the class functionality, not just the functionality of a single object.
Finally, if the class you want to mix into already has some of the mixin methods implemented, you can keep their original implementations by passing NO
for force in from:to:followInheritance:force
. Otherwise, all methods will be overriden by Mixin ones.
Take a look at Examples/Serializable.h
. There's a Serializable
class there which you mix into your class at runtime, and there's a SerializableMixin
protocol which your class should implement.
Methods that are marked as @required
have to be implemented by your class, and methods that are marked as @optional
will be mixed in from the Serializable
class at runtime. The optional methods are defined in the protocol in order to avoid "object may not respond to selector" compiler warnings.
Now take a look at ObjectiveMixinExamples/MountainBike.h
. This class complies with the SerializableMixin
protocol, by implementing the two required methods from that protocol. In ObjectiveMixinExamples/MountainBike.m
you can see that the Serializable
class is mixed in in the initialize
class method, which is invoked by the Obj-C runtime only once at class creation time. This way you're free from worrying about whether you already mixed in a certain class - this code is guaranteed to run only once.
(This approach was suggested to me by Benedict Cohen (@benedictC), thanks man!)
You should also check out the Singleton
example in Examples/Singleton.h
, I use that one a lot.
It's now also possible to dynamically create a subclass at runtime. In some ways, this is akin to being able to create concrete methods in protocols.
For example, you might declare a UIView mixin that stores a block that will be called in place of -drawRect: like this:
@protocol THDrawRectWithBlocks <NSObject>
@property (nonatomic, copy) void(^drawRectBlock)(UIView *self, CGRect rect);
@end
@interface THDrawRectWithBlocksMixin : UIView <THDrawRectWithBlocks>
@end
Implemented like this:
@implementation THDrawRectWithBlocksMixin
@synthesize drawRectBlock;
- (void)drawRect:(CGRect)rect
{
self.drawRectBlock(self, rect);
}
@end
You can then instantiate objects using the -allocWithSuperclass: method. For example, this will create a UIButton that has the methods from your THDrawRectWithBlocks class:
UIButton<THDrawRectWithBlocks> *button = [(UIButton<THDrawRectWithBlocks> *)[THDrawRectWithBlocksMixin allocWithSuperclass:[UIButton class]] initWithFrame:self.view.bounds];
button.drawRectBlock = ^(UIView *view, CGRect rect) {
[[UIColor redColor] set];
UIRectFill(rect);
};
Because the subclass is a 'real' subclass, even though it's created at runtime, it is possible (as in the above example) to declare properties and even ivars in the mixin class.
If you name your class with a "Mixin" suffix, and your protocol without one (as in this example), Objective Mixin will ensure that the dynamically created class is correctly marked as conforming to the protocol (so, in thie example, objects will respond to [button conformsToProtocol:@protocol(THDrawRectWithBlocks)] with YES).
Note that calling 'super' in your mixin code will, at runtime, call the method of the dynamic superclass (so, in this case, it would be UIButton's methods that would be called, not UIView's).
The convenience -allocWithSuperclass: method isn't powerful enough to allow more than one dynamic superclass, but you can use the more general -classWithSuperclass: method to 'chain' mixins, like this:
[[MySecondUIViewMixin classWithSuperclass:[MyFirstUIViewMixin classWithSuperclass:UIView] alloc] init];
ObjectiveMixin is just another mechanism you can use when designing your class hierarchy, in addition to the usual Objective-C design patterns. For example, you can have an algorithm that is used by multiple classes and you don't want to "pollute" their ancestor by extending it with a category. Plus, this is a runtime feature so it opens a lot of doors for experimentation. Feel free to read up on some Ruby mixin usage examples and implement them in Obj-C.
Fun!