Closed SteepAtticStairs closed 9 months ago
Your implementation of Unravel is correct, it just seems to fail on that case (which happens some times). Try using with strategy='long_range', to see if it works better for that specific case:
unravel_3D_pyart(radar, velname='velocity', dbzname='reflectivity', strategy='long_range')
Probably on your case study the region_based technique from PyART is going to work better though. Hope it helps!
Hello there,
I've recently discovered this library, and I've been trying to use it with Py-ART. I've thrown together this code that I assume would be a correct implementation of UNRAVEL:
Here is a link to the NEXRAD radar file I'm using (
KTLX20130520_201643_V06.gz
- the 2013 Moore tornado). It's a direct download link to the file from NOAA's AWS explorer: https://noaa-nexrad-level2.s3.amazonaws.com/index.htmlWhen I use Py-ART's region based algoritm (
dealias_region_based
), I get a correctly dealiased field:However, when I use UNRAVEL's
unravel_3D_pyart
function, I get large artifacts:Am I using or implementing UNRAVEL incorrectly? If so, could you correct my code? Or is this an issue with the algorithm itself, e.g. it doesn't do well for areas of rotation?
I would appreciate any information you have about this.