issues
search
w3c
/
rdf-star-wg-charter
Other
10
stars
3
forks
source link
issues
Newest
Newest
Most commented
Recently updated
Oldest
Least commented
Least recently updated
Apply suggestion by AC reviewers
#61
pchampin
closed
3 weeks ago
1
Plh edits
#60
plehegar
closed
3 months ago
0
renaming do not occur mid-charter
#59
pchampin
closed
5 months ago
0
change PGS to LEX
#58
domel
closed
5 months ago
1
Charter extension 2024-03
#57
pchampin
closed
5 months ago
6
write a full proposal of all document names [1]
#56
ghurlbot
closed
1 year ago
1
set up the doodle for the recurring time
#54
ghurlbot
closed
5 months ago
1
reflect on what they think is missing in the CG report
#53
ghurlbot
closed
5 months ago
1
create a firsr "spec" repo
#52
ghurlbot
closed
5 months ago
1
fix wrong link
#51
domel
closed
2 years ago
0
Adjust timeline
#50
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
add Adrian as chair
#49
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
Update timeline
#48
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
move all RDF specs to 18 month, and all SPARQL specs to 24 months
#47
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
contact Adrian and add him as chair in the charter draft
#46
ghurlbot
closed
2 years ago
2
W3M review
#45
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
Gregg Kellogg supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#44
gkellogg
closed
5 months ago
0
organize a call with Adrian Gschwend
#43
ghurlbot
closed
2 years ago
3
come back to Vladimir
#42
ghurlbot
closed
2 years ago
2
Thematix Partners LLC supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#41
ElisaKendall
closed
5 months ago
0
The Apache Software Foundation supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#40
afs
closed
5 months ago
0
KRDB Research Centre for Knowledge and Data supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#39
franconi
closed
5 months ago
0
Insee supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#38
FranckCo
closed
5 months ago
0
Quentin Reul supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#37
qhreul
closed
5 months ago
0
SEB group supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#36
Bric-e
closed
5 months ago
0
Fano Ramparany from the Orange group supports the creation of the RDF-star working group
#35
ramparany
closed
5 months ago
2
"Expression of Support" should not be the only way to respond to a proposal for new W3C work
#34
danbri
closed
2 years ago
2
set timeline to 24 months, as resolved for #25
#33
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
explain the rationale behing the list of specifications
#32
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
make it explicit that the group will aim for backward compatibility
#31
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
add Ora Lassila as chair
#30
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
2
Add Ora Lassila as one of the expected chair
#29
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
Add text to clearly state that existing RDF 1.1 data will remain valid in syntax and semantics.
#27
pchampin
closed
5 months ago
4
Request expressions of support
#26
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
WG timeline ?
#25
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
Versioning: 1.2 or 2.0?
#24
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
3
update copyright date
#23
samuelweiler
closed
2 years ago
0
s/initially/formerly/
#22
samuelweiler
closed
2 years ago
0
add an explicit rationale about the choice of documents to include
#28
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
Section 1.1 typo
#21
afs
closed
2 years ago
1
add liaison with Sparql 1.2 CG
#20
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
Include RDFa Core 1.2 as a normative specification to deliver
#19
csarven
closed
2 years ago
8
add liaisons
#18
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
Add explicit link to RDF 1.1 Primer
#17
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
0
update links from draft report to final report
#16
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
Include SPARQL docs for alignment and errata.
#15
afs
closed
2 years ago
0
add an explicit item about RDF primer in the charter
#14
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
AndyS: add missing SPARQL documents in the charter proposal
#13
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
addresses action #6
#12
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
address action #2
#11
pchampin
closed
2 years ago
1
Next