w3c standards-track issues

w3c / standards-track

Best Practices for Bringing Work to the W3C Recommendation Track

https://www.w3.org/Guide/standards-track/

9 stars 16 forks source link

issues

Newest

Newest Most commented Recently updated Oldest Least commented Least recently updated

Process pp links

#33 plehegar closed 3 months ago
0
add link per issue #28

#32 tantek opened 11 months ago
0
Updates for Director-free process changes, fix #30

#31 svgeesus closed 11 months ago
0
Updates for Director-free process changes

#30 svgeesus closed 11 months ago
0
needs a README with short summary and link to actual readable document

#28 tantek opened 6 years ago
1
volunteer as co-editor

#27 tantek opened 6 years ago
0
fix: typo

#26 marcoscaceres closed 6 years ago
1
Document and analyze obsolete RECs

#25 msporny opened 7 years ago
1
Incomplete sentence in ¶ "Is it clear the proposers are not seeking a rubber stamp from W3C?"

#24 stuartasutton opened 7 years ago
0
definition of "aspirational" should be further clarified

#23 tantek opened 7 years ago
2
fix typo

#22 tantek closed 11 months ago
0
fix indentation in in favor list

#21 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
duplicating request #11 in latest version

#20 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
arguments against incubation - clarify one on team participation

#19 wayneca closed 8 years ago
2
typo in "Clear RF licensing commitments?"

#18 wayneca opened 8 years ago
0
"gaps in the patent commitment" needs to be clarified - suggesting CLA problem?

#17 wayneca opened 8 years ago
0
problem statement downplays important WG roles

#16 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
Reference W3C CG Charter template

#15 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
target audience section doesn't include AC in decisions it shares with Director

#14 wayneca closed 8 years ago
1
target audience - combine Director and AC bullets

#13 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
correct typos

#12 wayneca closed 8 years ago
0
moving arguments made from the problem statement

#11 chaals closed 8 years ago
1
Add team involvement to develop proposals

#10 wseltzer closed 8 years ago
0
contributors

#9 tantek closed 8 years ago
1
what is restricted by the criteria: Charter? what WG can do before FPWD? publishing FPWD?

#8 wayneca closed 8 years ago
1
Wording of consensus based argument against mandatory incubation

#7 wayneca closed 8 years ago
1
Clarify the stage at which screens apply

#6 wseltzer closed 8 years ago
3
Should there be a proof of initial consensus?

#5 iherman closed 8 years ago
4
Rubber stamp should not be an 'additional consideration'

#4 iherman closed 8 years ago
1
Role of the W3C staff and core process?

#3 iherman closed 8 years ago
1
We are not talking only about traditional Web Sites and browsers

#2 iherman closed 8 years ago
1
User's community

#1 iherman closed 8 years ago
2