Open renoirb opened 9 years ago
Hey all,
I wanted to know if we will take an action to this item or if we close this.
@tilgovi you said you started an answer on the question but we didn’t talked it through.
What is your opinion on this?
Thanks
We talked it through in IRC I thought and the decision was not to concern ourselves with this since to actually do it properly we need to fetch the document server-side and somehow validate the annotation, which is very hard. If it becomes a problem we should look at solutions, but maybe not now?
Comment spam could be possible
Reproduce
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.w3.org/2014/annotation/experiment/webaudio.html" />
to a w3 spec<a href="mailto:public-audio-comments@w3.org" rel="reply-to">example</a>
Annotations from the spec AND the new document will have the same annotations.
See an example on renoirboulanger.com/readme.html which has the same canonical link element points to the webaudio spec annotation experiment document.
Proposed change
Solution paths
Would it be close to this part in annotator.document.js, method in
Document.prototype
Whitelisted domains
Code proposal
Resources